Skip to main content

Is dors.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - DORS.LV Reviews

D

Is dors.lv Safe? Security Analysis for DORS.LV

Check if dors.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
jQueryFont Awesome 6Owl Carousel
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:47:14 PM
28
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

DORS.LV appears to be a small business website based in Latvia, likely related to travel or local services, as indicated by the domain and language options. The website is built on WordPress and uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Font Awesome, and Owl Carousel. The site is accessible without any WAF or security challenges and uses HTTPS, which is a positive security indicator. However, the site lacks visible privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and contact information on the analyzed page, which limits its compliance posture and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification, but the domain's .lv TLD aligns with the claimed Latvian origin. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate technical maturity but requires improvements in privacy, security headers, and transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

jQueryFont Awesome 6Owl Carousel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website targets a general audience with multilingual support (Latvian, Russian, English), suggesting an intent to serve both local and international visitors. The business model and detailed services are not explicitly described on the analyzed page, limiting insights into revenue streams or market positioning. The site structure and navigation are clear and consistent, indicating a professional approach to user experience. No partnerships, certifications, or trust signals are evident, which may impact competitive advantage. The lack of contact details and policies suggests the business may be small or in early stages of digital maturity.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled, but no security headers were detected in the provided data, which is a missed opportunity to enhance protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. There is no evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing security best practices such as security headers, clear privacy notices, and incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

DORS.LV

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryFont Awesome 6Owl Carousel
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:dors.lv ip4:172.16.16.104 ip4:54.38.225.22 ?all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:?all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:54.36.31.145
AAAA Records:2001:41d0:301:3::27
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
5: mail.dors.lv
SOA:Serial: 1679170898, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:160ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:dors.lv ip4:172.16.16.104 ip4:54.38.225.22 ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

CRITICAL

Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

High-Risk Service Exposed: RPC

HIGH

Port 135 (RPC) is publicly accessible - RPC - Windows RPC endpoint

High-Risk Service Exposed: NetBIOS

HIGH

Port 139 (NetBIOS) is publicly accessible - NetBIOS - Windows file sharing

Critical Service Exposed: RDP

CRITICAL

Port 3389 (RDP) is publicly accessible - RDP - Remote Desktop, prime ransomware target

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS version 5.4.16 with plugins such as BlossomThemes Toolkit and Contact Form 7, along with frontend libraries like jQuery and Owl Carousel. The site loads multiple CSS and JS resources from its own domain and Google Fonts, indicating a standard modern web stack. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading, and mobile optimization is good based on responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic, with some screen-reader text present. SEO optimization is minimal with no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected on the analyzed page. The site lacks advanced technical configurations such as DNSSEC or security headers, which could be improved.
Analyze Another Website