Skip to main content

Is dreamwidth.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Dreamwidth Studios, LLC Reviews

D

Is dreamwidth.org Safe? Security Analysis for Dreamwidth Studios, LLC

Check if dreamwidth.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptjQuery 1.8.3Foundation FrameworkhCaptchaGoogle Analytics+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 2:56:56 AM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Dreamwidth Studios, LLC operates a niche online community platform focused on journaling and social networking. The website provides user account creation, content display preferences, and community engagement features. The platform has been active since at least 2009, indicating a stable presence in its market segment. The business model includes free community services supplemented by paid offerings available through a dedicated shop domain. Technically, the site employs a mix of legacy and modern web technologies including jQuery 1.8.3, Foundation framework, and hCaptcha for bot mitigation. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for user tracking, though no explicit cookie consent mechanism was detected, which may impact privacy compliance. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS enforced and CAPTCHA integration, but the absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data reduce overall trust. The site is accessible without WAF or security blocks, and content is safe for general audiences.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptjQuery 1.8.3Foundation FrameworkhCaptchaGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Dreamwidth holds a niche position in the online journaling and social networking space, targeting general users interested in community blogging. Its competitive advantage lies in its dedicated user base and open source ethos. Revenue streams appear to come from paid services and merchandise sales via partner domains. The company maintains a consistent brand and provides comprehensive legal policies, enhancing credibility. However, the lack of explicit contact information and incomplete WHOIS data may limit trust for new users. The partnership ecosystem includes merchandise and service shops, supporting business diversification. Growth indicators are moderate, with a focus on community rather than aggressive expansion.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and integration of hCaptcha to prevent automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited. The use of an outdated jQuery version introduces potential vulnerabilities if not properly patched. Privacy compliance is partially addressed through a comprehensive privacy policy, but the lack of a cookie consent mechanism and incident response contacts reduces compliance maturity. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security culture appears cautious but could benefit from formalized policies and updated technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Dreamwidth Studios, LLC

Description:

Dreamwidth Studios operates a community journaling platform offering user accounts, journal creation, and social networking features.

Key Services:
User account creationJournal and community hostingContent display preferencesSupport and merchandise shop
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptjQuery 1.8.3Foundation FrameworkhCaptchaGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
Foundation
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS
  • hCaptcha integration for bot mitigation
  • Secure form tokens (lj_form_auth hidden input)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses hCaptcha for bot protection.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=300; includeSubDomains"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com mx ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
17 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(204 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:34.194.104.197, 34.230.175.0, 3.233.211.222, 34.234.249.2
Name Servers:
ns-1090.awsdns-08.org
ns-1826.awsdns-36.co.uk
ns-422.awsdns-52.com
ns-715.awsdns-25.net
MX Records:
10: va-mail01.dreamwidth.org
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:65ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a combination of legacy and modern web technologies, including jQuery 1.8.3 and the Foundation front-end framework. The presence of asynchronous Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts indicates a focus on user behavior tracking. Performance is moderate, with no major blocking scripts detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, supported by responsive design and ARIA roles. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version suggests some technical debt and potential security risks. The site lacks a CMS indication and hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Analyze Another Website