Skip to main content

Is drupal.org a Scam? Security Check Results - drupal.org Reviews

drupal.org favicon

Is drupal.org Safe? Security Analysis for Access to this page has been denied.

Check if drupal.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/a
PerimeterX
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 7:30:27 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.drupal.org is currently inaccessible due to a Web Application Firewall (WAF) block powered by PerimeterX, which suspects automated browsing activity. This prevents access to any substantive content, metadata, or business information. Consequently, no detailed business description, contact information, or compliance policies are available for analysis. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to a malformed WHOIS response, leaving registrar, creation, and expiry dates unknown. This lack of data and site access significantly limits the ability to assess the website's security posture, technical infrastructure, or business credibility. From a technical perspective, the only detectable technology is the PerimeterX WAF service, indicating a security-conscious approach to mitigating automated threats. However, the absence of accessible content and metadata means no evaluation of SEO, accessibility, or performance can be performed. Security headers, SSL configuration, and other best practices cannot be verified. The security posture is indeterminate but currently low due to the inability to verify protections beyond the WAF. No vulnerabilities or compliance gaps can be identified without site access. The domain's legitimacy is uncertain given the lack of WHOIS data and the blocking mechanism in place. Overall, the risk assessment is high due to incomplete information and the presence of blocking controls that hinder transparency. Strategic recommendations include resolving the WAF blocking for legitimate users to enable full site access and analysis, publishing clear privacy and cookie policies, providing contact and incident response information, and ensuring security headers and SSL configurations are properly implemented. These steps will improve trust, compliance, and security posture visibility.

Detected Technologies

PerimeterX

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the WAF block and lack of accessible content, detailed business intelligence cannot be derived. The domain www.drupal.org is widely known as the official site for the Drupal content management system, a major open-source technology platform. However, no direct evidence from the provided data confirms this. No information on market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships is available. The presence of PerimeterX indicates a focus on security and bot mitigation. Without access to the site, insights into customer segments, growth indicators, or ecosystem partnerships cannot be confirmed.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@drupal.org

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is difficult to evaluate due to the WAF block preventing access to the site. The use of PerimeterX WAF suggests an advanced security control against automated threats. However, no information on SSL/TLS configuration, HTTP security headers, vulnerability disclosures, or incident response contacts is available. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected, but this is due to lack of access rather than confirmed security. Overall, the security maturity appears limited in transparency and documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Resolve WAF blocking issues to allow legitimate user access and enable full website analysis.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page shows a blocking message indicating access denied due to suspected automation tools, powered by PerimeterX WAF.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Technologies:
PerimeterX

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to WAF blocking by PerimeterX.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

90/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx include:amazonses.com include:servers.mcsv.net -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1360-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:re+myecnlkddmo@dmarc.postmarkapp.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
24 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(963 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.130.217, 151.101.66.217, 151.101.194.217, 151.101.2.217
Name Servers:
ns0.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns1.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns2.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns3.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns4.dnsmadeeasy.com
MX Records:
5: smtp2.osuosl.org
5: smtp4.osuosl.org
5: smtp3.osuosl.org
5: smtp1.osuosl.org
SOA:Serial: 2008052026, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:39ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx include:amazonses.com include:servers.mcsv.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The technical infrastructure is largely unknown due to the blocked content. The only detected technology is the PerimeterX WAF service used for bot mitigation and security. No CMS, frameworks, or hosting provider information is available. The HTML content is minimal and serves only as a block page with inline CSS and JavaScript for the captcha challenge. Performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility cannot be assessed. The site uses Google Fonts for typography. There is no evidence of analytics or marketing tools in the provided content.
Analyze Another Website