Skip to main content

Is dumplinghouse.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - dumplinghouse.lv Reviews

D

Is dumplinghouse.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Dumpling House

Check if dumplinghouse.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPressGoogle FontsjQueryBurst Statistics pluginComplianz GDPR plugin+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:18:12 PM
38
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website dumplinghouse.lv currently serves as a placeholder indicating that the domain is for sale and does not provide any business or product information. The only contact detail is an email address for domain purchase inquiries. The site is built on WordPress with several plugins including a GDPR cookie consent plugin and a statistics plugin. The technical infrastructure is basic but functional, with HTTPS enabled and some modern web fonts and scripts used. However, the site lacks critical business information, privacy policies, and security headers, which limits its credibility and compliance posture. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, restricting trust analysis. Overall, the site is minimal and primarily serves as a domain sale landing page.

Detected Technologies

WordPressGoogle FontsjQueryBurst Statistics pluginComplianz GDPR pluginOtter Blocks pluginTheme Twenty Twenty Five

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The domain dumplinghouse.lv appears to be positioned for resale rather than active business operations. There is no evidence of active business services, products, or market positioning. The target audience is domain buyers. The business model is domain resale, with no visible revenue streams or partnerships. The lack of business content and contact information suggests the domain is either newly acquired or abandoned. There are no indicators of growth or strategic partnerships. The site does not provide VAT, registration, or legal company information.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

n*****@dumplinghouse.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, which is a positive security indicator. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There are no visible forms or user inputs, reducing attack surface, but also limiting user engagement. The site uses a GDPR cookie consent plugin, indicating some awareness of privacy compliance, but no privacy policy or terms of service pages were found. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be improved with standard best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Add a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website states that it does not provide information about dumplings and that the domain is for sale. It includes a contact email for domain purchase inquiries.

Key Services:
Domain sale
Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressGoogle FontsjQueryBurst Statistics pluginComplianz GDPR pluginOtter Blocks pluginTheme Twenty Twenty Five
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Burst Statistics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a placeholder indicating domain is for sale.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 42 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.241
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: dumplinghouse.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025061300, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:90ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using the Twenty Twenty Five theme and several plugins including Burst Statistics for analytics and Complianz GDPR for cookie consent. It uses Google Fonts and jQuery. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements. However, the site lacks advanced SEO optimization and accessibility enhancements. The absence of security headers and minimal content indicate technical debt and opportunity for modernization. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content.
Analyze Another Website