Skip to main content

Is e-steel.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - TB Fence SIA Reviews

e-steel.lv favicon

Is e-steel.lv Safe? Security Analysis for TB Fence SIA

Check if e-steel.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
Google Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)jQueryCSS3HTML5+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:50:42 PM
40
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

TB Fence SIA operates the e-steel.lv website, specializing in the sale of metal construction materials including metal pipes, square bars, fences, gates, and 3D panel fencing. The company targets construction professionals and retail customers primarily in Latvia, offering a diverse product catalog with competitive pricing and cutting services. The website demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity with a functional e-commerce platform, clear navigation, and multilingual support. Technical infrastructure includes modern tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics, with a cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, though explicit security headers are not detected, indicating room for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy verification, but available contact information and business details support a credible business presence. Overall, the site is professionally presented, safe for general audiences, and positioned as a regional supplier in the manufacturing and retail sectors.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)jQueryCSS3HTML5Cookie Consent plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the manufacturing and retail sectors, focusing on metal construction materials. Its business model combines B2B and B2C e-commerce sales, supported by a comprehensive product catalog and discount offerings. The presence of multiple language versions suggests an intent to serve a broader regional market. The company maintains a physical office and warehouse in Riga, Latvia, reinforcing its operational legitimacy. Marketing efforts leverage Google Ads and analytics for customer insights and retargeting. The website's structure and content indicate a stable market position with potential for growth through enhanced digital marketing and security improvements.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@e-steel.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712244****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and implements a cookie consent banner aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, which could hinder rapid mitigation of security issues. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager requires ongoing monitoring to prevent supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from enhanced header configurations, documented security policies, and a security.txt file to improve transparency and incident handling readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen browser security.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

TB Fence SIA

Description:

Supplier and retailer of metal pipes, square bars, fences, gates, 3D panels with high quality and cutting services.

Key Services:
Metal pipes and bars salesFences and gates3D panel fencingCutting services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)jQueryCSS3HTML5Cookie Consent plugin
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Ads
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

šŸ›”ļøSecurity Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

šŸ‘¤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

šŸ›”ļøNIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

šŸ“§Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

šŸ†SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 50 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

šŸ“ŠDNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: czn54tf3cw4ot6yvvv7vfd2wtbhjdid4573jbgw5o5w3n3ehov6q.mx-verification.google.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:172.104.147.6
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
15: czn54tf3cw4ot6yvvv7vfd2wtbhjdid4573jbgw5o5w3n3ehov6q.mx-verification.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1720425602, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:234ms

⚔Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

šŸ”§Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript libraries such as jQuery. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, with preconnect hints for fonts and CDN usage for scripts. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The hosting provider is not identified from the content. The site includes a cookie consent plugin with user preference management, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and accessibility enhancements are recommended to reduce risks and improve compliance.
Analyze Another Website