Skip to main content

Is eac.gov a Scam? Security Check Results - U.S. Election Assistance Commission Reviews

eac.gov favicon

Is eac.gov Safe? Security Analysis for U.S. Election Assistance Commission

Check if eac.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Statesmedium
Drupal 10jQueryChosen jQuery pluginFlexsliderGlightbox+3 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 3:50:32 PM
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) is a federal government agency dedicated to improving election administration and voter participation across the United States. It provides comprehensive resources, guidelines, certification programs, and research to support election officials and voters. The website serves as a central hub for election-related information, including voting technology, grants, and accessibility resources. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10 and leverages modern web technologies and the U.S. Web Design System to ensure accessibility and responsiveness. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and standard best practices, though explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms could be enhanced. The absence of WHOIS data is typical for .gov domains and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Overall, the EAC website is a professional, trustworthy, and authoritative source for election administration information.

Detected Technologies

Drupal 10jQueryChosen jQuery pluginFlexsliderGlightboxGoogle Tag ManagerAddToAny sharingPlyr video player

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The EAC holds a unique market position as the sole federal agency focused on election administration, serving a broad audience including election officials, voters, researchers, and policymakers. Its business model is government-funded and centered on providing regulatory guidance, certification, and educational resources. The agency maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with other government entities and leverages social media for outreach. The website's extensive content and resource offerings indicate a mature digital presence with ongoing updates and engagement. The EAC's role is critical in ensuring secure, accessible, and accurate elections nationwide.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, secure form handling, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of explicit security headers in the HTML and absence of a published vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file suggest areas for improvement. The site does not display a cookie consent banner despite using tracking technologies like Google Tag Manager, which may impact privacy compliance. Incident response contact information is not clearly provided, which could hinder timely reporting of security issues. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and visibly display a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

U.S. Election Assistance Commission

Description:

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) is an independent, bipartisan commission whose mission is to help election officials improve the administration of elections and help Americans participate in the voting process. It is the only federal agency solely focused on election administration, working to protect election equipment, support election officials, serve voters, and make elections safe, secure, accurate, and accessible.

Key Services:
Election Management GuidelinesElection Official ToolkitsVoting System Testing & CertificationResearch and Data ReportsGrants Management and OversightVoter Resources and Accessibility Support
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Drupal 10jQueryChosen jQuery pluginFlexsliderGlightboxGoogle Tag ManagerAddToAny sharingPlyr video player
Frameworks:
Drupal CMSUS Web Design System (USWDS)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

excellent

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper labels and ARIA attributes
  • Use of external scripts from trusted sources

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
AddToAny social sharing
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Official U.S. government website with .gov domain

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx ip4:159.142.143.142 ip4:159.142.176.240 ip4:159.142.144.34 ip4:159.142.144.35 ip4:159.142.168.34 ip4:104.22.7.204 ip4:172.67.27.195 ip4:104.22.6.204 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.google.com include:spf.dynect.net include:cl cloud_us-gov-east-1_glb_2.appiancloud.com -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@eac.gov
Forensic Reports:dmarc@eac.gov

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:eac.gov
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/17/2025 (72 days)
SANs:eac.gov, *.eac.gov

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(333 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:104.20.23.201, 172.66.148.76
AAAA Records:2606:4700:10::ac42:944c, 2606:4700:10::6814:17c9
Name Servers:
evangeline.ns.cloudflare.com
noel.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
0: eac-gov.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2381116020, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:58ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx ip4:159.142.143.142 ip4:159.142.176.240 ip4:159.142.144.34 ip4:159.142.144.35 ip4:159.142.168.34 ip4:104.22.7.204 ip4:172.67.27.195 ip4:104.22.6.204 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.google.com include:spf.dynect.net include:cl cloud_us-gov-east-1_glb_2.appiancloud.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, utilizing a modern tech stack including jQuery, Chosen plugin, Flexslider, Glightbox, and Google Tag Manager. It follows the U.S. Web Design System for consistent and accessible UI/UX. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses HTTPS exclusively, ensuring secure communications. The technical infrastructure appears well-maintained with no visible errors or broken elements. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Analyze Another Website