Skip to main content

Is easynails.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - easynails.lv Reviews

easynails.lv favicon

Is easynails.lv Safe? Security Analysis for EASYnails.lv - Manikīra veikals Rīga - Latvijā. Lietuva, Igaunijā

Check if easynails.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviasmall
Google FontsBootstrapFont AwesomeMasterSliderSwiper+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:10:32 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

EASYnails.lv is an e-commerce website specializing in manicure products primarily serving customers in Riga, Latvia, and the Baltic region including Lithuania and Estonia. The website presents a professional retail storefront with a focus on beauty and nail care products. The technical infrastructure is based on OpenCart with the Journal3 theme, leveraging modern front-end libraries such as Bootstrap, Font Awesome, and JavaScript libraries for sliders and carousels. Tracking and marketing tools include Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, indicating moderate user tracking and marketing sophistication. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented; however, the absence of visible security headers and privacy policy reduces compliance confidence. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is functional, professionally designed, and safe for general audiences but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

Google FontsBootstrapFont AwesomeMasterSliderSwiperGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates as a small regional e-commerce retailer in the beauty sector, focusing on manicure products. Its market positioning targets consumers in Latvia and neighboring Baltic countries, leveraging online sales channels. The business model is direct-to-consumer retail with no visible affiliate or partner domains. The website's use of standard e-commerce CMS and marketing tools suggests a moderate level of digital maturity. Lack of visible contact information and compliance documentation may impact customer trust and regulatory adherence. Growth opportunities include improving transparency, adding comprehensive privacy and terms policies, and enhancing security measures.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security is a gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of visible incident response or security policies and absence of WHOIS data reduces overall trust. Compliance with GDPR is uncertain due to missing privacy policy. The site uses third-party tracking scripts which require careful management to avoid privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be improved with standard best practices and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

EASYnails.lv is an online retail store specializing in manicure products, targeting customers in Riga, Latvia, and neighboring Baltic countries Lithuania and Estonia.

Key Services:
Online sales of manicure products
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google FontsBootstrapFont AwesomeMasterSliderSwiperGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel
Frameworks:
Journal3 (OpenCart theme)
Platforms:
OpenCart
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Facebook Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelGoogle Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:zoho.eu ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 38 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.238
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.zoho.eu
50: mx3.zoho.eu
20: mx2.zoho.eu
SOA:Serial: 2025060900, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:128ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:zoho.eu ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on OpenCart with the Journal3 theme, using Bootstrap for responsive design and Font Awesome for icons. It integrates MasterSlider and Swiper for interactive UI elements. Google Fonts are used for typography. Marketing and analytics are handled via Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with no obvious blocking or errors. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider and backend infrastructure details are not discernible from the HTML. Overall, the technical stack is modern and suitable for a small e-commerce retailer but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Analyze Another Website