Skip to main content

Is edcom.fr a Scam? Security Check Results - Edcom Reviews

edcom.fr favicon

Is edcom.fr Safe? Security Analysis for Edcom

Check if edcom.fr is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TelecommunicationsFrancemedium
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarHubSpotSendinblue+5 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 2:25:51 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Edcom is a French-based comparison platform specializing in mobile phone plans, internet box offers, and smartphones. Established in 2006 and operated by the Bemove group, it serves French consumers seeking to compare telecom offers and find promotions. The website provides comprehensive comparison tools, guides, and interactive maps to assist users in making informed decisions. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries, tracking tools like Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and HubSpot, and maintains good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure forms, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, Edcom presents a professional, trustworthy, and user-friendly platform with strong business credibility in the French telecom market.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarHubSpotSendinblueBing AdsOpeCloudAppConsentMutationObserver APICSS with custom fonts (Inter, RedHatDisplay)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Edcom holds a strong market position as a trusted telecom comparison site in France, leveraging affiliate marketing to generate revenue by redirecting users to operator offers. Its partnership ecosystem includes major French telecom operators such as Bouygues Telecom, Orange, SFR, and Free. The business model focuses on providing transparent and comprehensive comparisons, supported by media recognition and a clear brand identity. Target customers are French consumers looking for affordable and suitable telecom plans. The company benefits from its parent company Bemove's backing, enhancing operational stability and growth potential.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@camwiegert.com

Phone Numbers (2)

+3397100****
+3323095****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, secure form handling, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing vigilance to prevent vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating potential gaps in transparency regarding security governance. Overall, the site is secure for users but could enhance its security framework documentation and headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options headers to strengthen security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Edcom

Description:

Edcom is a French comparison website that allows users to compare mobile phone plans, internet box offers, and smartphones. It provides promotions and deals from various operators to help consumers save money.

Key Services:
Mobile plan comparisonInternet box offers comparisonSmartphone comparisonData usage estimation toolsMobile network coverage maps
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarHubSpotSendinblueBing AdsOpeCloudAppConsentMutationObserver APICSS with custom fonts (Inter, RedHatDisplay)
Frameworks:
Google Tag Manager containers
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with validation
  • Use of modern JavaScript libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)HotjarHubSpot AnalyticsWysistat
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Bing AdsGoogle Ads (via GTM)
Tracking Pixels:
HotjarHubSpotSendinblue
Marketing Tools:
HubSpotSendinblue
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a well-established French telecom comparison platform

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Weak X-Frame-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "ALLOWALL"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mailjet.com ip4:51.255.87.7 ip4:163.172.73.8 include:mx.ovh.com include:3385629.spf10.hubspotemail.net ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
19 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(279 days)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:91.209.35.152
Name Servers:
dns.ovh.net
ns.ovh.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025081600, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:138ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mailjet.com ip4:51.255.87.7 ip4:163.172.73.8 include:mx.ovh.com include:3385629.spf10.hubspotemail.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack with JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, HubSpot, and Sendinblue for marketing and analytics. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts with unicode-range optimizations. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance is moderate, with some heavy scripts and multiple tracking pixels. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses asynchronous script loading to improve page load times. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Analyze Another Website