Skip to main content

Is edels.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Edels Reviews

edels.lv favicon

Is edels.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Edels

Check if edels.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

E-commerceLatviasmall
Google FontsBootstrapFont AwesomeMasterSliderSwiper+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:14:27 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Edels is an e-commerce retail website primarily targeting a Russian-speaking audience, operating under the domain edels.lv, which suggests a Latvian base. The website offers online shopping services, likely in various product categories, using a known e-commerce platform (OpenCart) with the Journal3 theme. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, Font Awesome, and Google Fonts, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Mobile optimization and responsive design are implemented, providing a good user experience across devices. However, the website lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. Security posture is moderate but limited by the absence of detected security headers and unknown SSL configuration. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting the ability to verify domain legitimacy and registration details. Overall, the site appears functional and professionally designed but requires improvements in security and compliance documentation to enhance trust and legal standing.

Detected Technologies

Google FontsBootstrapFont AwesomeMasterSliderSwiperJournal3 theme

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the e-commerce sector, targeting general consumers likely within Latvia and Russian-speaking regions. The business model is retail-focused, selling products online through a web storefront. Market positioning and competitive advantages are unclear due to limited business information and absence of certifications or trust signals. The website's content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise with a basic but consistent branding approach. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The lack of contact information and business registration details reduces transparency and may impact customer trust. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the website content. Strategic observations recommend enhancing business credibility by publishing clear contact details, privacy policies, and certifications.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@edels.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level of the website is basic to moderate. HTTPS is presumably enabled given the base URL uses https, but SSL configuration details are not available. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection laws. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, limiting the ability for external parties to report security issues. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The site would benefit from implementing security best practices, including security headers, documented policies, and incident response contacts to improve its security posture and compliance readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about data handling.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Edels

Description:

Edels

Key Services:
online retail of products
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google FontsBootstrapFont AwesomeMasterSliderSwiperJournal3 theme
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.inbox.eu ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:91.194.76.181
Name Servers:
ns1.garmtech.comDNS only
ns2.garmtech.comDNS only
ns3.garmtech.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.inbox.eu
SOA:Serial: 2025020702, TTL: 10800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:158ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.inbox.eu ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a standard e-commerce CMS platform (OpenCart) with the Journal3 theme, leveraging Bootstrap for responsive design and Font Awesome for icons. It uses Google Fonts for typography, enhancing visual appeal. The site appears to be moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a structured layout with clear navigation. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced performance optimizations detected. Accessibility features are basic, with some semantic HTML elements and responsive design but no explicit ARIA roles or advanced accessibility aids noted. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured data (JSON-LD) detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and compliance-related content.
Analyze Another Website