Is edmondjsafra.org Safe? Security Analysis for Edmond J. Safra Foundation
https://edmondjsafra.orgCheck if edmondjsafra.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The Edmond J. Safra Foundation website represents a well-established philanthropic organization dedicated to supporting charitable projects in science, medicine, religion, education, and general philanthropy. The foundation targets donors, researchers, and philanthropic partners, positioning itself as a reputable non-profit entity with a global outreach. The website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and technologies, providing a professional and responsive user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA implemented, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and GDPR-aligned privacy policy. Overall, the site reflects a trustworthy and credible foundation, though the lack of WHOIS transparency slightly reduces domain trust. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response information, and adding a security.txt file to improve vulnerability disclosure transparency.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The foundation operates as a non-profit philanthropic entity with a focus on impactful charitable projects. Its business model revolves around grant-making and supporting research and community initiatives. The website content and external links indicate partnerships with reputable organizations and a focus on legacy and education. The foundation's market position is strong within the philanthropic sector, leveraging its founder's legacy. Growth indicators include recent news updates and new project launches. The foundation maintains a professional online presence but could benefit from more explicit business contact details and certifications to enhance credibility.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, and a cookie consent mechanism supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy information are not published, which limits transparency. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which is a minor concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is secure but could improve transparency and header configurations.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Edmond J. Safra Foundation
The Edmond J. Safra Foundation is a philanthropic organization established by Edmond J. Safra, focusing on supporting needy individuals and organizations through various projects in science, medicine, religion, education, and general philanthropy.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
- Cookie consent mechanism implemented
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 49 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about edmondjsafra.org
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published