Skip to main content

Is eexchanger.co a Scam? Security Check Results - eexchanger.co Reviews

eexchanger.co favicon

Is eexchanger.co Safe? Security Analysis for Currency exchange

https://eexchanger.co

Check if eexchanger.co is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
BootstrapjQueryGoogle FontsFont AwesomeIonicons+6 more
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 3:11:41 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website eexchanger.co operates as an online currency exchange platform specializing in electronic currencies and cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash. It targets individuals and businesses seeking safe and convenient currency exchange services online. The platform's market position appears to be niche with a basic but functional service offering. Technically, the site employs a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various UI libraries, alongside marketing and tracking tools like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. Mobile optimization is adequate, though accessibility and SEO are basic. Security posture shows HTTPS usage but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies, which could be improved. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages and no clear cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is functional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security measures.

Detected Technologies

BootstrapjQueryGoogle FontsFont AwesomeIoniconsFlaticonOwl CarouselMagnific PopupGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelBinotel Chat Widget

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Eexchanger.co operates in the finance sector as an online currency exchange service. Its business model revolves around facilitating electronic and cryptocurrency exchanges. The platform likely generates revenue through exchange fees or spreads. The target audience includes crypto users and electronic currency holders. The site uses third-party chat and tracking services to engage users and monitor activity. The lack of detailed company information and privacy policies suggests a small-sized operation with limited public-facing corporate transparency. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The business appears to be focused on providing a straightforward exchange service rather than a broad financial ecosystem.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of eexchanger.co is moderate. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for financial transactions, but lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS. No explicit incident response or security policies are published. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors, especially without visible CSP or script integrity checks. Forms are present via chat widgets but no explicit CSRF or input validation mechanisms are visible. Privacy compliance is weak, increasing regulatory risk. Overall, the site should enhance its security controls, publish clear policies, and implement best practices to reduce vulnerabilities and increase user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Internet currency exchanger. Online electronic currency exchange. Safe currency exchange

Key Services:
Currency exchangeBitcoin and Bitcoin Cash transactionsElectronic currency exchange
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
BootstrapjQueryGoogle FontsFont AwesomeIoniconsFlaticonOwl CarouselMagnific PopupGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelBinotel Chat Widget
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL (https://eexchanger.co)
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with async loading

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook PixelBinotel Chat Widget
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no WAF blocking

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

50/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

DMARC Partial Enforcement

LOW

DMARC only applies to 50% of messages

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.protonmail.ch mx ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none(50% enforcement)
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 70 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:eexchanger.co
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:12/13/2025 (70 days)
SANs:eexchanger.co, *.eexchanger.co

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.137.23, 104.21.62.163
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::ac43:8917, 2606:4700:3036::6815:3ea3
Name Servers:
hassan.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
julissa.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.protonmail.ch
20: mailsec.protonmail.ch
SOA:Serial: 2383996897, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:101ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.protonmail.ch mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a Bootstrap framework with common front-end libraries such as jQuery, Font Awesome, and Owl Carousel. It integrates Google Fonts and uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site includes a third-party chat widget from Binotel. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are minimal. SEO is basic with meta keywords and description but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. The site would benefit from modernization in accessibility and SEO practices and improved security configurations.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about eexchanger.co

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website