Is ekohousecosmetics.com Safe? Security Analysis for EKOhouse Cosmetics
Check if ekohousecosmetics.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
EKOhouse Cosmetics is a Latvian small business specializing in organic cosmetic products for face and body care, operating since 2013. The company emphasizes natural ingredients, vegan-friendly products, and affordability, targeting Latvian consumers interested in natural skincare. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, providing a multilingual e-commerce platform. Technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks explicit security policies and incident response information. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company positions itself as a local Latvian organic cosmetics manufacturer with a focus on quality and affordability. Its business model centers on direct e-commerce sales through a WordPress WooCommerce platform. The target market is Latvian consumers seeking natural and vegan cosmetic products. The company maintains active social media channels on Facebook and Instagram, enhancing brand presence. The domain registration is consistent with the business profile, and the website content supports the brand's mission. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data. The company appears to maintain a small but focused operation with a clear niche in the retail cosmetics sector.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, no DNSSEC is enabled, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected in the HTML content. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism despite tracking scripts indicates partial GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended security headers, cookie consent, and publishing security policies.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
EKOhouse Cosmetics
EKOhouse Cosmetics is a Latvian manufacturer producing organic cosmetic products for face and body care since March 2013. The products are handmade, free from harmful chemicals, and suitable for vegans. The company emphasizes honesty, quality, and customer health, offering natural cosmetics at affordable prices.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- ClientTransferProhibited domain status
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, Facebook
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 75 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
Critical Service Exposed: MySQL
CRITICALPort 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings