Skip to main content

Is ekomi.de a Scam? Security Check Results - eKomi GmbH Reviews

ekomi.de favicon

Is ekomi.de Safe? Security Analysis for eKomi GmbH

https://ekomi.de

Check if ekomi.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyGermanymedium
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerTypekit FontsWordPress
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 7:04:32 AM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

eKomi GmbH operates a technology platform focused on collecting and managing customer reviews to enhance business reputation and customer trust. The company targets businesses seeking to leverage customer feedback for marketing and quality improvement. The website is built on WordPress with a moderate technical infrastructure including Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, and Typekit for fonts. The hosting is managed via INWX nameservers, indicating a professional hosting setup. Security posture is limited based on the provided data, with no visible security headers or explicit security policies. Privacy and cookie policies are not detected, which is a compliance gap. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerTypekit FontsWordPress

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

eKomi holds a solid position in the customer review and reputation management sector, offering SaaS solutions primarily to B2B clients. The business model revolves around enabling companies to collect authentic customer feedback and display it to build trust. The company appears medium-sized and operates in Germany. The website content and technical setup suggest a mature digital presence but lack some compliance and security best practices. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data. The company could benefit from clearer contact information and published policies to strengthen credibility.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture shows gaps including absence of security headers, no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies, and lack of privacy and cookie consent mechanisms. The use of HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses standard third-party analytics which may raise privacy considerations. Incident response contact channels are not published, limiting transparency. Overall, security maturity is basic and improvements are recommended to meet GDPR and industry standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

eKomi GmbH

Description:

eKomi is a technology company specializing in collecting and managing customer reviews and ratings to help businesses build trust and improve customer experience.

Key Services:
Customer reviews collectionReputation managementFeedback analyticsTrust building solutions
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerTypekit FontsWordPress
Frameworks:
Bootstrap 3.3.5
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

73/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.ekomi.de -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-aggregate@msg.ekomi.de
Forensic Reports:dmarc-forensic@msg.ekomi.de

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:178.32.162.205
Name Servers:
ns.inwx.de
ns2.inwx.de
ns3.inwx.deWHOIS only
ns3.inwx.euDNS only
ns4.inwx.comDNS only
ns5.inwx.netDNS only
MX Records:
100: ekomi-de.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025092401, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:85ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.ekomi.de -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap 3.3.5 framework and uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. Fonts are served via Adobe Typekit. Hosting is managed through INWX nameservers. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present. No advanced security configurations or modern frameworks beyond Bootstrap 3 were detected. The site could benefit from modernization and improved technical SEO and accessibility compliance.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about ekomi.de

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website