Skip to main content

Is elararchive.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Endangered Languages Archive Reviews

elararchive.org favicon

Is elararchive.org Safe? Security Analysis for Endangered Languages Archive

Check if elararchive.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
jQuery 3.6.0jQuery UI 1.13.1Google AnalyticsAddThis sharing toolsPreservica Content Access plugin+1 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 6:59:42 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Endangered Languages Archive (ELAR) is a specialized non-profit digital repository dedicated to preserving multimedia collections of endangered languages worldwide. It offers a safe, long-term archive for language documentation, supports depositors with training, and provides free access to researchers, communities, and the public. The website is professionally designed and branded, reflecting its mission and partnerships with reputable organizations such as Preservica and BBAW. The target audience includes academic researchers, language communities, and the general public interested in linguistic heritage. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and jQuery UI, and integrates Google Analytics and AddThis for tracking and sharing. It employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and includes a cookie consent mechanism linking to an external cookie policy. However, it lacks a visible privacy policy and terms of service on the main site, which are important for compliance and user trust. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization but could improve accessibility and SEO features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent but does not show evidence of security headers or published security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, which is common for non-profit organizations and does not raise immediate concerns given the professional site and trusted partnerships. Overall, ELAR presents a trustworthy and valuable resource for endangered language preservation with a solid technical foundation. To enhance trust and compliance, it should publish clear privacy and security policies and implement additional security headers. These improvements will strengthen its security posture and user confidence.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.6.0jQuery UI 1.13.1Google AnalyticsAddThis sharing toolsPreservica Content Access pluginWordPress 6.8.1

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

ELAR occupies a niche market as a digital archive for endangered languages, serving academic and community stakeholders. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus, free access model, and partnerships with established organizations like Preservica. The business model is non-commercial, relying on funding and grants, with a focus on preservation and accessibility rather than revenue generation. The website's content and structure indicate a mature digital presence with ongoing updates and community engagement via social media. Growth potential exists through expanded collections and enhanced digital services. The partnership ecosystem includes technology providers and funding bodies, reinforcing operational stability and credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which limits transparency. The lack of a privacy policy and terms of service may expose compliance gaps, particularly under GDPR. No direct evidence of vulnerabilities or data exposure was found, indicating a generally secure environment. Enhancing security documentation, implementing additional headers, and publishing incident response contacts would improve the security culture and readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy clearly accessible from the homepage.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Endangered Languages Archive

Description:

The Endangered Languages Archive (ELAR) is a digital repository for preserving multimedia collections of endangered languages from all over the world, making them available for future generations. ELAR provides a safe long-term repository for language documentation collections, trains and supports depositors, makes collections accessible free of charge to researchers, communities, and the public, and supports users in discovering and accessing recordings.

Key Services:
Long-term digital preservationTraining and support for depositorsFree access to collectionsDiscovery and access support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.6.0jQuery UI 1.13.1Google AnalyticsAddThis sharing toolsPreservica Content Access pluginWordPress 6.8.1
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
AddThis
Marketing Tools:
AddThis
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a specialized digital archive for endangered languages.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

90/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 60 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

5 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.elararchive.org
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/6/2025 (60 days)
SANs:www.elararchive.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
medium(72 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:46.30.213.96
AAAA Records:2a02:2350:5:10b:8006:7aad:b512:25a3
Name Servers:
ns01.one.com
ns02.one.com
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025082405, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:98ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

CRITICAL

Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

High-Risk Service Exposed: RPC

HIGH

Port 135 (RPC) is publicly accessible - RPC - Windows RPC endpoint

High-Risk Service Exposed: NetBIOS

HIGH

Port 139 (NetBIOS) is publicly accessible - NetBIOS - Windows file sharing

Critical Service Exposed: SMB

CRITICAL

Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

Critical Service Exposed: MSSQL

CRITICAL

Port 1433 (MSSQL) is publicly accessible - MSSQL - Database server

Critical Service Exposed: Oracle

CRITICAL

Port 1521 (Oracle) is publicly accessible - Oracle - Database server

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

Critical Service Exposed: RDP

CRITICAL

Port 3389 (RDP) is publicly accessible - RDP - Remote Desktop, prime ransomware target

Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

CRITICAL

Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

Critical Service Exposed: Redis

CRITICAL

Port 6379 (Redis) is publicly accessible - Redis - In-memory database

High-Risk Service Exposed: Elasticsearch

HIGH

Port 9200 (Elasticsearch) is publicly accessible - Elasticsearch - Search engine

Critical Service Exposed: MongoDB

CRITICAL

Port 27017 (MongoDB) is publicly accessible - MongoDB - NoSQL database

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using up-to-date JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 3.6.0 and jQuery UI 1.13.1. It integrates Google Analytics for user tracking and AddThis for social sharing, indicating a moderate level of digital marketing sophistication. The site uses external CDN resources for fonts and icons, improving load times. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. However, SEO optimization is basic, and accessibility features are limited. The site relies on Preservica's content access plugin, indicating a specialized archival infrastructure. Technical risks include reliance on third-party scripts and lack of advanced security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve compliance.
Analyze Another Website