Skip to main content

Is elecosoft.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Elecosoft Reviews

elecosoft.com favicon

Is elecosoft.com Safe? Security Analysis for Elecosoft

Check if elecosoft.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Kingdommedium
WordPressBootstrap CSSjQueryModernizrStripe payment integration+3 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 5:07:28 PM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Elecosoft is a UK-based software company specializing in collaboration software for the built environment sector, offering project management, CAFM, and PIM systems. The company has an established market presence since 2011, targeting professionals in construction, facility management, and project delivery. Their website reflects a mature digital infrastructure built on WordPress with modern technologies and integrations such as Stripe for payments and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain protections in place, though additional security headers could enhance defenses. Privacy compliance is strong, featuring a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, Elecosoft presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with clear business information and user engagement tools.

Detected Technologies

WordPressBootstrap CSSjQueryModernizrStripe payment integrationGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebot consent managementIonicons

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Elecosoft operates in a niche market providing software solutions tailored to the built environment industry. Their business model centers on SaaS and software licensing, supported by integrations with payment and analytics partners. The company leverages partnerships with Stripe, Cookiebot, and Tawk.to to enhance user experience and compliance. The website content and structured data indicate a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and a focus on delivering value to project managers and facility operators. The absence of privacy protection in WHOIS data and a domain age of over 12 years support legitimacy and business stability. The company’s digital marketing employs moderate tracking and analytics balanced with user privacy controls.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

+4420742*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status locks to prevent unauthorized changes, reflecting good baseline security. Cookie consent is managed with granularity, and third-party scripts are limited to reputable providers. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact is a gap in transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional HTTP headers and publishing formal security documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Elecosoft

Description:

Making better business decisions with software for the built environment that covers project management, CAFM and PIM systems.

Key Services:
Project management softwareCAFM (Computer-Aided Facility Management)PIM (Project Information Management) systems
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressBootstrap CSSjQueryModernizrStripe payment integrationGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebot consent managementIonicons
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsPlausible AnalyticsClickDimensions
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
ClickDimensions
Tracking Pixels:
Google Analytics (via GTM)Plausible Analytics
Marketing Tools:
CookiebotTawk.to live chat
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses modern web technologies and consent management.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

95/100
Score

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_u.elecosoft.com._spf.smart.ondmarc.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.mlsend.com include:spf.uk.exclaimer.net -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:00d1a7f7@inbox.ondmarc.com
Forensic Reports:00d1a7f7@inbox.ondmarc.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
14 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(350 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:46.16.236.23
Name Servers:
ns1-03.azure-dns.com
ns2-02.azure-dns.netWHOIS only
ns2-03.azure-dns.netDNS only
ns3-02.azure-dns.orgWHOIS only
ns3-03.azure-dns.orgDNS only
ns4-03.azure-dns.info
MX Records:
10: elecosoft-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:109ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_u.elecosoft.com._spf.smart.ondmarc.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.mlsend.com include:spf.uk.exclaimer.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for scripting. It integrates Stripe for payment processing and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management. Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure, indicating reliable cloud hosting. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting the company’s business goals effectively.
Analyze Another Website