Skip to main content

Is eleport.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Eleport Reviews

eleport.com favicon

Is eleport.com Safe? Security Analysis for Eleport

Check if eleport.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyEstoniamedium
WordPressElementorJet EngineGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:45:10 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Eleport is a company operating a rapidly growing network of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations, primarily targeting sustainable travelers and EV owners. The business is positioned in the energy and transportation sectors, with a focus on providing convenient and flexible EV charging solutions. Their website offers information on charging station locations, pricing, and user guides, supporting their service-oriented business model. Founded in 2016 and based in Estonia, Eleport presents itself as a medium-sized enterprise with a consistent and professional online presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Jet Engine plugins, hosted likely on Microsoft Azure infrastructure as indicated by Azure DNS servers. The site employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, alongside Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. The site demonstrates good SEO practices and mobile optimization, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration and enforces client transfer prohibition on the domain. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. The site lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are areas for improvement. Cookie consent is implemented effectively, indicating good privacy compliance, though no explicit privacy policy or terms of service were found in the analyzed content. Overall, Eleport's website is professional, trustworthy, and technically sound, with moderate tracking and advertising practices typical for commercial sites. The absence of some compliance documents and security headers slightly reduces the security posture score. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and implementing a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorJet EngineGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelCookiebot

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Eleport operates in the niche market of EV charging infrastructure, a rapidly expanding sector driven by sustainability trends and increasing EV adoption. Their competitive advantage lies in a growing network and user-friendly digital presence. The business model focuses on providing accessible charging stations and related information, targeting EV owners and environmentally conscious consumers. Revenue streams likely include charging fees and partnerships with advertisers or service providers. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem including major platforms like Facebook for marketing. Growth indicators include domain age since 2016 and active digital marketing efforts. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding network coverage and enhancing digital services to maintain market position.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Eleport demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent compliance. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies indicates gaps in defense-in-depth and transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, and forms appear secured though detailed form analysis was limited. Compliance gaps include missing privacy policy and incident response information, which are critical for GDPR and NIS2 alignment. The security culture appears basic but functional, with room for improvement in proactive vulnerability management and communication.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Eleport

Description:

Eleport, a rapidly growing network of the EV charging stations, allows everyone to travel sustainably. Charging stations location, prices and guides.

Key Services:
EV charging station networkCharging station location servicesPricing informationUser guides
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorJet EngineGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelCookiebot
Frameworks:
WordPress CMSElementor page builder
Platforms:
Azure DNS hosting
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft tracking pixels
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Meta Platforms, Inc.Google
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15768000; includeSubDomains"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:amazonses.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(63 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:37.143.66.30
Name Servers:
ns1-34.azure-dns.com
ns2-34.azure-dns.net
ns3-34.azure-dns.org
ns4-34.azure-dns.info
MX Records:
0: eleport-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:82ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:amazonses.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with Elementor and Jet Engine plugins, indicating a flexible and customizable infrastructure. Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure, providing reliable cloud infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The presence of multiple third-party scripts for analytics and marketing introduces some technical complexity and potential privacy considerations. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests opportunities for modernization and hardening. Overall, the technical stack supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website