Skip to main content

Is eliterature.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Electronic Literature Organization Reviews

eliterature.org favicon

Is eliterature.org Safe? Security Analysis for Electronic Literature Organization

Check if eliterature.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationUnited Statessmall
WordPress 6.8.2PHPJavaScriptGoogle FontsStatCounter analytics
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 5:48:21 AM
39
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The Electronic Literature Organization (ELO) is a well-established non-profit organization founded in 1999, dedicated to the promotion and study of literature created for digital media. It serves an international academic and artistic community through conferences, publications, and digital archives. The website reflects this mission with rich content, clear navigation, and a professional design consistent with its educational and cultural focus. The organization maintains partnerships with reputable academic institutions and publishers, reinforcing its credibility and market position within the digital humanities and electronic literature sectors. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.2, utilizing standard web technologies including JavaScript and Google Fonts. It is hosted under a domain registered with Network Solutions since 1999, indicating long-term stability. The site is HTTPS enabled, mobile responsive, and moderately optimized for performance and SEO. However, it lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for enhanced security. Analytics are limited to StatCounter, indicating minimal user tracking. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates basic good practices such as HTTPS and domain transfer protection but lacks explicit security policies, vulnerability disclosures, and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. No critical vulnerabilities or adult content were detected, and the site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms. Overall, the ELO website is a credible, professional platform serving a niche academic and artistic community. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and transparency around data protection would enhance its security posture and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2PHPJavaScriptGoogle FontsStatCounter analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The ELO occupies a unique niche in the education and media sectors, focusing on electronic literature and digital humanities. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing history, international reach, and partnerships with academic institutions and publishers. The business model is membership and grant-funded, supplemented by publishing activities and conferences. Target customers include academics, artists, and researchers interested in digital literature. Growth indicators include ongoing conferences, awards, and active digital archives. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving universities and cultural organizations, which supports sustainability and influence in its domain.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level is basic to moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer is protected, but the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. There is no published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits transparency and preparedness. Data protection practices are not explicitly detailed, and cookie consent mechanisms are missing, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and similar regulations. The security culture appears minimal but adequate for a non-profit academic site. Enhancements in these areas would reduce risk and improve trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Electronic Literature Organization

Description:

An international organization dedicated to the investigation of literature produced for the digital medium. Founded in 1999, it promotes writing, publishing, and reading of electronic literature, hosts conferences, publishes anthologies and reports, and maintains digital archives.

Key Services:
Annual conference and media art festivalPublishing open source anthologies (Electronic Literature Collection)Maintaining electronic literature directories and archivesPartnerships with academic and cultural institutions
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2PHPJavaScriptGoogle FontsStatCounter analytics
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
StatCounter
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
StatCounter
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based non-profit organization site focused on electronic literature.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 31 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

11 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
25 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(405 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:50.6.111.64
Name Servers:
ns97.worldnic.com
ns98.worldnic.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 125081320, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:237ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with version 6.8.2, leveraging standard web technologies such as JavaScript and Google Fonts. The site is mobile responsive and moderately optimized for performance and SEO. Hosting details beyond the registrar are not explicit, but the domain is stable and long-standing. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers indicates room for modernization in security infrastructure. The use of StatCounter for analytics suggests minimal tracking, aligning with privacy-conscious practices. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's mission but could benefit from security and privacy enhancements.
Analyze Another Website