Skip to main content

Is ello.co a Scam? Security Check Results - Zhuimi Inc Reviews

Z

Is ello.co Safe? Security Analysis for Zhuimi Inc

Check if ello.co is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Statessmall
HTML5JavaScriptGoogle Adsense Domains CAFCloudfront CDNGoogle Ad Services
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 11:41:11 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website ello.co is currently a parked domain owned by Zhuimi Inc, with no active business or service content. The site primarily displays advertisements and a call to purchase the domain, indicating it is held for resale. The technical infrastructure relies on standard HTML and JavaScript with Google Adsense and Cloudfront CDN for content delivery. The site lacks modern security configurations such as DNSSEC and security headers, and does not provide privacy or cookie consent mechanisms. No contact or business information is available, limiting trust and credibility. Overall, the site is low risk but offers minimal value beyond domain parking.

Detected Technologies

HTML5JavaScriptGoogle Adsense Domains CAFCloudfront CDNGoogle Ad Services

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The domain is positioned as a domain parking and resale asset rather than an operational business. There is no evidence of a business model beyond domain monetization through ads and resale. The target audience is domain buyers or investors. The lack of active content or services means there are no competitive advantages or growth indicators. The partnership ecosystem includes advertising networks like Google Adsense and DoubleClick. Strategic observations suggest the domain is held for speculative purposes with no current market presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal with basic SSL/TLS but no DNSSEC or security headers detected. The site does not implement privacy or cookie consent mechanisms, nor does it provide incident response or security policy information. Tracking scripts and pixels are present, indicating moderate user tracking without transparency. There are no visible vulnerabilities or malware, but the lack of security best practices and policies represents a compliance gap. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are absent.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC and implement standard security headers to improve domain and site security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Zhuimi Inc

Description:

This domain appears to be a parked domain with an offer to purchase it. No active business or services are presented on the site.

Key Services:
domain parkingdomain resale
Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5JavaScriptGoogle Adsense Domains CAFCloudfront CDNGoogle Ad Services
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseGoogle Ad ServicesDoubleClick
Tracking Pixels:
Google Ad Services trackingYouseasky tracking
Marketing Tools:
Google Adsense Domains CAF
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a parked domain with no active content or services.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

72/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip6:fd1b:212c:a5f9::/48 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 56 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(142 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:185.53.177.50
Name Servers:
ns1.parkingcrew.net
ns2.parkingcrew.net
MX Records:
1: alltheemails.com
5: mail.h-email.net
SOA:Serial: 1754221000, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:56ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip6:fd1b:212c:a5f9::/48 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic HTML5 and JavaScript with external scripts from Google Adsense and Youseasky for advertising. Hosting is via Cloudfront CDN, providing moderate performance. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level but lacks accessibility and SEO optimization. There is no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The technical debt is low due to minimal content but modernization opportunities include adding security headers, improving privacy compliance, and enhancing user experience.
Analyze Another Website