Skip to main content

Is elpublishing.org a Scam? Security Check Results - EL Publishing Reviews

elpublishing.org favicon

Is elpublishing.org Safe? Security Analysis for EL Publishing

Check if elpublishing.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationUnited Kingdomsmall
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1SiteOrigin PanelsComplianz GDPR pluginFont Awesome 4.6.2
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 4:43:41 AM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

EL Publishing is a specialized open access academic publishing platform dedicated to endangered and minority languages. It offers eBooks, multimedia, and training materials, supported by an international advisory board and employing rigorous double-blind peer review. The platform targets academics, language communities, and enthusiasts, positioning itself as a niche but trusted resource in the education sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and hosted on a UK-based provider, delivering moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned cookie management. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich, though it could improve transparency around security and incident response.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1SiteOrigin PanelsComplianz GDPR pluginFont Awesome 4.6.2

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the education and non-profit sectors, focusing on endangered language documentation and dissemination. Its open access model broadens reach and inclusivity, serving a global academic and community audience. The platform's partnerships with language organizations and academic journals enhance its credibility and ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include grants, donations, and institutional support rather than commercial sales. The company is small, founded in 2013, with consistent domain registration and hosting aligned with its UK base. The business model emphasizes accessibility, quality content, and community engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks implementation of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness perception. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could enhance security maturity by adopting additional best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to strengthen defense-in-depth.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

EL Publishing

Description:

EL Publishing is a free, platinum open access publishing platform supported by an international Advisory Board and employing full double-blind peer review. It publishes eBooks, multimedia, and training material on documentation, description and support for minority and endangered languages. It formerly published the journal Language Documentation and Description.

Key Services:
Publishing eBooksPublishing multimediaTraining materialsWeb hosting and maintenance for language organizations
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1SiteOrigin PanelsComplianz GDPR pluginFont Awesome 4.6.2
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based academic publishing platform focused on endangered languages.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:185.194.90.25 ip4:77.72.2.42 include:relay.k.io a mx ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 83 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

6 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(410 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:77.72.2.42
Name Servers:
ns1.krystal.co.ukWHOIS only
ns1.krystal.ukDNS only
ns2.krystal.co.ukWHOIS only
ns2.krystal.ukDNS only
MX Records:
20: mx2.krystal.uk
10: mx1.krystal.uk
SOA:Serial: 2025090600, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:120ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:185.194.90.25 ip4:77.72.2.42 include:relay.k.io a mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a WordPress CMS with a modern version (6.8.2) and common plugins such as SiteOrigin Panels and Complianz GDPR for layout and privacy compliance. It employs jQuery and Font Awesome for UI elements. Hosting is provided by Krystal in the UK, consistent with domain registration. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance.
Analyze Another Website