Skip to main content

Is email-provider.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - email-provider.eu Reviews

E

Is email-provider.eu Safe? Security Analysis for email-provider.eu

Check if email-provider.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 5:37:42 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at email-provider.eu is currently a minimal placeholder page displaying only a reference to another domain (email-provider.nl) and an IP address. There is no meaningful content, metadata, or business information available on the site. The domain is registered with TransIP Group BV, a reputable registrar, but no further registrant details or business legitimacy indicators are present. The technical infrastructure appears basic with no detected CMS, frameworks, or security headers. No HTTPS or SSL information is provided, indicating a lack of secure communication. The absence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the site lacks essential business and security information, resulting in a low trust and credibility profile.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the minimal content and lack of business information, it is not possible to determine the company's market position, business model, or target audience. The domain appears to be either unused or serving as a redirect or placeholder. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or certifications are evident. The hosting provider is TransIP Group BV, indicating a European hosting location, but no further business intelligence can be derived.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is weak. There is no evidence of HTTPS/SSL usage, no security headers, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The lack of privacy and cookie policies further indicates poor compliance with data protection regulations. No security best practices are observed, and the site is vulnerable to basic security risks. The absence of contact information for security incidents or data protection officers limits the ability to respond to potential threats.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is extremely minimal, only displaying a single line referencing another domain and IP address.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "1, 1"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.laposta.nl
Issuer:Trust Provider B.V. TLS RSA CA G1
Valid Until:1/14/2026 (129 days)
SANs:*.laposta.nl, laposta.nl, *.email-provider.nl +5 more

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:213.154.235.49
AAAA Records:2001:7b8:c03::1
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-d1.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-d2.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-d3.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-d4.googledomains.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: in1-smtp.messagingengine.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:67ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website lacks any detectable modern technologies, frameworks, or CMS platforms. The HTML content is minimal and does not include meta tags, Open Graph, or structured data. Hosting is provided by TransIP Group BV, a known European provider. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be accurately assessed due to the minimal content. The site shows signs of technical debt and requires modernization to support business operations and security compliance.
Analyze Another Website