Skip to main content

Is emine.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Emine Reviews

E

Is emine.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Emine

Check if emine.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuery
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:33:28 PM
39
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website emine.lv presents a minimal landing page primarily in Russian with options for Latvian and English languages. It appears to represent a small business named Emine, but lacks detailed business descriptions, contact information, or trust indicators. The technical infrastructure is basic, utilizing HTML5, CSS3, jQuery, and the Skel framework for responsive design. However, the site lacks HTTPS and security headers, which significantly impacts its security posture. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor compliance with data protection regulations. The absence of contact details and WHOIS data due to query limits further limits the ability to verify legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional but lacks professionalism and security maturity.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Emine.lv targets a general audience with content in Russian and language options for Latvian and English, suggesting a regional focus in Latvia. The business model and market position are unclear due to minimal content and lack of explicit service descriptions. No partnerships or certifications are evident. The site structure suggests a small business with limited digital presence and no visible revenue or growth indicators. The lack of contact information and policies reduces business credibility and trustworthiness.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of emine.lv is weak. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to potential risks. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other regulations. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, preventing verification of domain legitimacy. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found. Overall, the site requires significant improvements to meet basic security and compliance standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Emine

Description:

No explicit business description found in the content. The website appears to be a landing page with navigation links to About, Gallery, Prices, and Contact pages in Russian language.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuery
Frameworks:
Skel
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is minimal with mostly navigation and logo.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

15/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'default' uses 1008-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:91.203.69.242 +ip4:85.31.97.23 -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1008-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 30 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.242
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: emine.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025073007, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:131ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:91.203.69.242 +ip4:85.31.97.23 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a simple tech stack with HTML5, CSS3, jQuery, and the Skel framework for responsive design. The site lacks modern CMS or backend technologies, indicating a static or lightly dynamic site. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal with no meta description or Open Graph tags detected. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, which limits data-driven insights but improves privacy. The site would benefit from modernization, improved accessibility, and enhanced SEO practices.
Analyze Another Website