Skip to main content

Is emonmon.com a Scam? Security Check Results - emonmon.com Reviews

emonmon.com favicon

Is emonmon.com Safe? Security Analysis for 自考招生网-自考时间,自考网上报名,自考辅导培训,自考本科报名,自考成绩查询,自考报名网站

Check if emonmon.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationChinasmall
BootstrapjQueryHTML5CSS3
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 9:16:52 AM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website emonmon.com operates as a Chinese educational portal specializing in self-study exam information, including news, policies, exam schedules, results queries, and study materials. It targets Chinese self-study exam candidates and adult learners, providing a comprehensive resource hub for exam preparation and registration guidance. The business model is primarily informational and service-oriented, focusing on niche educational content within China. The domain is newly registered in 2024, consistent with the website's content and business age, and it holds an ICP备案 number indicating regulatory compliance in China. Technically, the website employs Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, delivering a responsive and well-structured user experience optimized for both desktop and mobile devices. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with appropriate meta tags and navigation clarity. However, the hosting and security infrastructure shows room for improvement, with no DNSSEC enabled, no visible security headers, and no explicit HTTPS enforcement information provided. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking tools beyond a Baidu push script, indicating minimal user tracking. From a security perspective, the site maintains a moderate posture with domain transfer protection but lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and modern security headers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is limited, with no cookie policy or consent mechanism evident, and no GDPR compliance indicators, which may be acceptable given the primarily Chinese audience but represents a compliance gap for international standards. Overall, emonmon.com is a functional and content-rich educational portal with a clear market niche and consistent business information. Security and privacy practices require enhancement to improve trust and compliance. The site is safe for general audiences with no adult or explicit content detected.

Detected Technologies

BootstrapjQueryHTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Emonmon.com positions itself as a specialized educational information provider in the Chinese self-study exam market. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating timely exam news, policies, schedules, and study resources tailored for adult learners and exam candidates. The business model is content-driven, likely monetized through partnerships or advertising, although no explicit monetization mechanisms were detected. The target customers are geographically segmented across multiple Chinese cities via subdomains, indicating a broad regional reach. The partnership ecosystem includes various educational institutions and related service sites linked as friendly sites. Growth indicators include recent domain registration and active content updates. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing security and privacy compliance to build greater trust and possibly expanding service offerings such as online tutoring or exam registration facilitation.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

3*****@qq.com

Phone Numbers (1)

138*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of emonmon.com is moderate. The domain is protected against unauthorized transfer with clientTransferProhibited status, which is a positive control. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces resilience against DNS spoofing and clickjacking attacks. No HTTPS enforcement details were provided, which is critical for protecting user data in transit. The site lacks published security policies or incident response contacts, limiting transparency and preparedness for security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the content. Privacy compliance is weak, with no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR indicators, which could pose regulatory risks if the site targets EU users. Overall, the site should prioritize implementing modern security headers, enabling DNSSEC, enforcing HTTPS, and publishing security and incident response policies to improve its security maturity.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

自考招生网,提供全国最新的自考政策,自考时间,自考网上报名,自考辅导培训,自考本科报名,成人自考本科,考试科目大纲,历年考试试题,自考专业,自考院校及自考成绩查询,帮助考生快捷的获取自考信息。

Key Services:
Self-study exam news and policy updatesOnline exam registration guidanceExam schedules and results queriesStudy materials and exam outlinesSelf-study exam tutoring and trainingInformation on colleges and majors
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
BootstrapjQueryHTML5CSS3
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfer

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu linksubmit push.js
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Chinese educational portal focused on self-study exams.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.1TLSv1.2

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:103.41.80.57
Name Servers:
ns1.julydns.comDNS only
ns2.julydns.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1751917398, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:483ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a classic frontend stack with Bootstrap and jQuery, providing responsive design and compatibility with older browsers (IE9 fallback scripts included). The HTML structure is valid and includes appropriate meta tags for viewport and keywords, supporting SEO. Performance is moderate, with external scripts loaded from reliable CDNs. No CMS or backend technology was detected from the HTML content. The site is mobile-optimized with a dedicated mobile version link and responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical debt is low given the simple stack, but modernization opportunities include upgrading to newer JavaScript frameworks and improving security infrastructure. No critical technical risks were identified that would impact business operations immediately.
Analyze Another Website