Is emps.org.au Safe? Security Analysis for Australasian Fire and Emergency Services Authorities Council Limited
Check if emps.org.au is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The AFAC Emergency Management Professionalisation Scheme website serves as a credentialing platform for emergency management practitioners in Australia, supported by the Australasian Fire and Emergency Services Authorities Council Limited (AFAC). The site provides information on registration, certification, ethics, and continuing professional development, positioning itself as a national authority in emergency management professionalisation. The business model focuses on benchmarking skills and assuring qualifications against nationally-agreed standards, targeting emergency service agencies and practitioners. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and themes, including TheGem and WPBakery, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and professional design, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks some security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy linked via the parent AFAC site but no cookie consent mechanism on the site itself. Overall, the domain registration and WHOIS data align well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
AFAC EMPS operates as an important entity within the government and non-profit sectors, providing a specialized credentialing service for emergency management professionals. Its market position is strong nationally, backed by AFAC, which enhances credibility and reach. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on professional registration and certification, which likely generates revenue through registration fees. The target customers are emergency management practitioners and agencies seeking professional recognition. The partnership with AFAC and presence on major social media platforms indicate a well-established ecosystem. Growth indicators include ongoing updates and professional content. The absence of direct contact information on the site suggests a centralized contact approach via AFAC. Strategic observations include opportunities to enhance privacy compliance and security transparency to further strengthen trust.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a gap that could be exploited in certain attack vectors. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms, which may pose regulatory risks especially under GDPR or similar frameworks. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, but no explicit data retention policies are disclosed. Overall, the security culture appears professional but could benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls to align with best practices.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Australasian Fire and Emergency Services Authorities Council Limited
Credentialing practitioners in emergency management since 2015, benchmarking skills against professional standards, providing assurance to individuals and agencies that qualifications meet nationally-agreed requirements. Supported by AFAC, the National Council for fire and emergency services.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is professionally designed and maintained using WordPress CMS.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled
MEDIUMDomain can be transferred without authorization
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
- •No domain protection locks enabled
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings