Skip to main content

Is emteko.com a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA Emteko Reviews

emteko.com favicon

Is emteko.com Safe? Security Analysis for SIA Emteko

Check if emteko.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareLatviasmall
Google Tag ManagerGoogle FontsBootstrap 4.0.0
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:12:34 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA Emteko operates as a wholesale distributor of pharmaceutical products and cosmetics within the European market, primarily targeting distributors and retailers. The company appears to be a small-sized entity founded in 2013, with a stable domain registration and a website primarily in Latvian. The website is built on WordPress, utilizing Bootstrap 4 and Google Fonts, and incorporates Google Tag Manager for analytics. While the technical infrastructure is moderately modern and the site is mobile-optimized, there is a lack of comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, as well as absence of explicit contact information and security disclosures. The security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle FontsBootstrap 4.0.0

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Emteko positions itself as a niche wholesale distributor in the healthcare sector, focusing on pharmaceutical and cosmetic products across Europe. The business model is B2B wholesale distribution, with no visible e-commerce or direct consumer sales. The company benefits from a long-established domain and consistent branding. However, the lack of visible trust indicators such as certifications or customer testimonials limits its perceived credibility. The absence of detailed contact information and compliance documentation may impact customer confidence and regulatory compliance.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@emteko.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement. No incident response contacts or security policies are published, which could hinder timely response to security incidents. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate tracking but no explicit privacy compliance mechanisms are evident. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA Emteko

Description:

SIA Emteko ir farmaceitisko produktu un kosmētikas līdzekļu vairumtirdzniecības izplatītājs Eiropas teritorijā.

Key Services:
Wholesale distribution of pharmaceutical productsWholesale distribution of cosmetics
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle FontsBootstrap 4.0.0
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 33 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:31.131.20.181
Name Servers:
nsa1.srv53.comDNS only
nsa2.srv53.netDNS only
nsa2.srv53.orgDNS only
nsb1.srv53.comDNS only
nsb3.srv53.orgDNS only
nsb4.srv53.netDNS only
nsc2.srv53.comDNS only
nsc2.srv53.netDNS only
nsc2.srv53.orgDNS only
nsd2.srv53.netDNS only
nsd3.srv53.comDNS only
nsd3.srv53.orgDNS only
MX Records:
10: emteko-com.mail.protection.outlook.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a standard WordPress CMS with Bootstrap 4 for responsive design and Google Fonts for typography. Google Tag Manager is deployed for analytics and tracking. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has basic SEO metadata. Hosting appears stable with a reputable registrar and multiple DNS servers. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected in the HTML content. However, the site lacks advanced technical security features such as DNSSEC and security headers, and does not expose structured data beyond basic Open Graph tags.
Analyze Another Website