Skip to main content

Is emurgo.io a Scam? Security Check Results - EMURGO Reviews

emurgo.io favicon

Is emurgo.io Safe? Security Analysis for EMURGO

Check if emurgo.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/alarge
ReactNext.jsWebM videoSVGCSS animations+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 5:23:38 AM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

EMURGO is a prominent blockchain technology company and a co-founding entity of the Cardano blockchain. It focuses on driving the commercial adoption of blockchain technology and asset tokenization, targeting a broad audience including established businesses, startups, builders, and Web3 users. The company offers a diverse range of services including asset tokenization technologies, fintech solutions bridging fiat and blockchain, media content creation, ecosystem development, and venture capital funding for innovative Web3 projects. Regional subsidiaries such as EMURGO Middle East & Africa and EMURGO Africa further extend its reach and impact. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content that aligns with its business objectives.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsWebM videoSVGCSS animationsGoogle Fonts (Inter, Aeonik)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

EMURGO holds a strong market position as a key player in the Cardano ecosystem, leveraging partnerships with Input Output Global and the Cardano Foundation. Its business model integrates technology development, investment, and regional adoption initiatives. The company demonstrates significant growth indicators with over 800,000 wallet users, a fiat-backed stablecoin launch, and $200 million in investments. The target customer segments include traditional financial institutions, blockchain builders, and global enterprises seeking blockchain integration. EMURGO's strategic focus on asset tokenization and fintech innovation positions it competitively within the blockchain finance sector.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

v*****@emurgo.io

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and secure contact forms, indicating a baseline security posture. However, explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS are not detected, and there is no publicly available security policy or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure program and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in transparency and security maturity. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced security practices and documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

EMURGO

Description:

EMURGO provides blockchain products and services for builders and organizations to adopt and build on the Cardano blockchain. It is a co-founding entity of the Cardano blockchain that drives the commercial adoption of blockchain technology and asset tokenization.

Key Services:
Asset tokenization technologiesFintech bridging fiat and blockchainMedia content creation for CardanoEcosystem development with partnersVenture capital funding for Web3 projectsRegional adoption in Middle East & Africa
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsWebM videoSVGCSS animationsGoogle Fonts (Inter, Aeonik)
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure contact forms

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ptr include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 73 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
mario.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
sandy.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ptr include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on WPEngine, ensuring good performance and scalability. It features responsive design optimized for mobile devices and employs multimedia content such as WebM videos and SVG graphics for rich user experience. The CMS appears to be WordPress, likely in a headless or integrated configuration. SEO and accessibility considerations are evident, with proper meta tags and structured content. Technical risks are minimal, but the lack of explicit security headers and incident response mechanisms represent areas for technical enhancement.
Analyze Another Website