Skip to main content

Is enableme.org a Scam? Security Check Results - EnableMe Foundation Reviews

E

Is enableme.org Safe? Security Analysis for EnableMe Foundation

https://enableme.org

Check if enableme.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitSwitzerlandmedium
JavaScriptMatomo AnalyticsCookieFirst Consent Management
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 3:29:20 AM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

EnableMe Foundation is a well-established non-profit organization dedicated to empowering people with disabilities worldwide through information dissemination, peer communities, and digital services. The organization operates multiple country-specific platforms and offers services such as job portals and apprenticeship programs, positioning itself as a global leader in disability inclusion. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with excellent content quality and user experience. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks, Matomo analytics, and a consent management platform, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS and privacy mechanisms in place, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Overall, the site is trustworthy and compliant with privacy regulations, though WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection. The absence of direct contact emails and phone numbers suggests a preference for contact via forms, typical for non-profits. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptMatomo AnalyticsCookieFirst Consent Management

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

EnableMe Foundation operates in the non-profit sector focused on disability inclusion, serving a global audience with localized platforms in Switzerland, Germany, Kenya, Uganda, Ukraine, and Morocco. Its business model centers on providing digital information, community support, and inclusion services without commercial advertising. The foundation leverages partnerships and technology to scale impact, with a strong presence on social media and community forums. Growth indicators include recent launches in new countries and the introduction of digital tools like SafeSpace. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving philanthropic, corporate, and NGO collaborators. The organization's market position is strong within the disability inclusion niche, supported by consistent branding and high-quality content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent mechanisms, and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, nor a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, which could enhance transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through privacy and cookie policies. No vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were detected in the content or scripts. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

EnableMe Foundation

Description:

The EnableMe Foundation empowers people with disabilities across the world by providing information, self-help peer communities & digital services.

Key Services:
Information disseminationSelf-help peer communitiesDigital inclusion servicesCommunity forumsJob and apprenticeship portals
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptMatomo AnalyticsCookieFirst Consent Management
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Matomo
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Matomo
Marketing Tools:
Matomo AnalyticsCookieFirst Consent Management
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional non-profit platform focused on disability inclusion.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com include:spf.crsend.com include:sendgrid.net include:9133543.spf10.hubspotemail.net ip4:208.117.49.186 ~all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

85/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 46 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.enableme.org
Issuer:R12
Valid Until:11/19/2025 (46 days)
SANs:*.enableme.org, enableme.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(49 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:78.47.139.182
AAAA Records:2a01:4f8:d0a:435e::2
Name Servers:
helium.ns.hetzner.de
hydrogen.ns.hetzner.com
oxygen.ns.hetzner.com
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025091003, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:286ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com include:spf.crsend.com include:sendgrid.net include:9133543.spf10.hubspotemail.net ip4:208.117.49.186 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

CRITICAL

Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern tech stack including JavaScript and the Pimcore CMS, with Matomo analytics and CookieFirst for privacy management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with deferred script loading and optimized images. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The site uses multiple country-specific subdomains or domains to serve localized content. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence with opportunities for further optimization in security headers and performance tuning.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about enableme.org

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website
enableme.org Security Analysis - Potentially Unsafe (Score: 47/100) | EnableMe Foundation Safety Check | OffSeq