Skip to main content

Is encrypt.one a Scam? Security Check Results - FINAL LEVEL Reviews

F

Is encrypt.one Safe? Security Analysis for FINAL LEVEL

Check if encrypt.one is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
AES 256 encryption (CryptoJS)jQueryW3.CSS framework
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:58:00 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Encrypt.One is a specialized online service offering client-side AES 256 encryption for secure text and file sharing. The platform targets users seeking privacy and security in sharing sensitive information by encrypting data within the browser before transmission, ensuring the server only stores encrypted content. The business is positioned as a niche technology provider with a small but focused market presence, backed by the parent company FINAL LEVEL. The service emphasizes transparency through open source code availability on Github and clear explanations of its encryption methodology. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including CryptoJS for encryption and jQuery for UI interactions, hosted via GoDaddy infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and functional design.

Detected Technologies

AES 256 encryption (CryptoJS)jQueryW3.CSS framework

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the technology sector, specifically in secure communications and encryption services. Its business model revolves around providing a free or low-barrier online tool for secure sharing, potentially monetized through sponsorships or related services. The presence of multiple sponsor links indicates a partnership ecosystem supporting the platform. The domain age and registration details align with the company's founding date, suggesting operational maturity. However, the lack of publicly available contact information and privacy policies may limit trust and compliance with data protection regulations. The open source nature and transparency about encryption practices are competitive advantages in the security-conscious market segment.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Encrypt.One demonstrates a solid security foundation by implementing client-side AES 256 encryption, ensuring sensitive data is never transmitted in plaintext. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and explicit privacy or incident response policies represent gaps in the security posture. The domain uses privacy protection, which is justified given the nature of the service. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The service would benefit from enhanced security headers, DNSSEC implementation, and published security policies to improve trust and compliance, especially under GDPR and similar regulations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

FINAL LEVEL

Description:

Encrypt One is an online encrypted text and secure file sharing service that uses browser-based AES 256 encryption to allow users to securely share secret files or passwords.

Key Services:
AES 256 encryption in browserSecure encrypted text sharingSecure encrypted file sharing (up to 5MB)Random password and passphrase generation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
AES 256 encryption (CryptoJS)jQueryW3.CSS framework
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • Client-side AES 256 encryption before upload
  • No plaintext data sent to server
  • Encrypted data stored on server only
  • Passphrase not sent to server

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website provides client-side AES 256 encryption for secure sharing.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:168.119.185.208
Name Servers:
ns05.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns06.domaincontrol.comDNS only

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a lightweight and modern technology stack with CryptoJS for AES encryption and jQuery for UI functionality, styled with W3.CSS. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with proper meta tags for SEO. Hosting appears to be via GoDaddy with domain privacy protection enabled. Performance is moderate with no heavy scripts or trackers detected. However, the lack of CMS or advanced frameworks suggests limited scalability. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security hardening. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but could be improved with enhanced security and compliance features.
Analyze Another Website