Skip to main content

Is energoauditors.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Sertificēts neatkarīgais eksperts, būvinženieris Sandris Liepiņš Reviews

energoauditors.com favicon

Is energoauditors.com Safe? Security Analysis for Sertificēts neatkarīgais eksperts, būvinženieris Sandris Liepiņš

Check if energoauditors.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyLatviasmall
WordPressJetpackGutenbergFLIR thermal camera (mentioned for services)
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:34:26 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website energoauditors.com represents an independent certified expert and civil engineer, Sandris Liepiņš, specializing in building technical inspections, energy audits, and related consulting services primarily in Latvia. The business has a niche market position with over a decade of experience, offering detailed and compliant services aligned with Latvian and EU standards. The website content is professional and detailed, targeting building owners, managers, and construction professionals seeking expert evaluations and certifications. Technically, the site is built on WordPress.com with Jetpack and Gutenberg, indicating moderate digital maturity. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, though SEO and accessibility are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain locks in place, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

WordPressJetpackGutenbergFLIR thermal camera (mentioned for services)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Energoauditors.com operates as a small, specialized service provider in the energy and real estate sectors, focusing on building inspections, energy efficiency audits, and certifications. The business model is fee-based consulting and expert services, with a clear target audience of Latvian property stakeholders. The website demonstrates strong domain age consistency and trust indicators such as certifications and detailed service descriptions. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests a gap in regulatory compliance. The site leverages WordPress.com hosting and Jetpack tools, indicating reliance on established platforms but limited custom infrastructure. No advertising or affiliate marketing is present, focusing purely on service delivery. The business appears stable with a solid reputation in its niche.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@inbox.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712939****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and domain registration protections (clientDeleteProhibited, etc.), which enhance baseline security. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduce its defense-in-depth. No incident response or security contact information is published, limiting transparency in case of security events. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerable libraries but lacks formal privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance and security concern. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Sertificēts neatkarīgais eksperts, būvinženieris Sandris Liepiņš

Description:

Independent certified expert and civil engineer providing detailed building technical inspections, deformation monitoring, geological surveys, laboratory testing, energy audits, energy certification, thermography, and consulting services primarily in Latvia.

Key Services:
Building technical inspection and reportingDeformation and vibration monitoringGeological surveys and sample testingEnergy audits and energy certificationThermography and thermal imagingConsulting and expert testimonyLectures and seminars
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressJetpackGutenbergFLIR thermal camera (mentioned for services)
Frameworks:
WordPress theme pub/mistylook
Platforms:
WordPress.com hosting
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
WordPress.com stats pixel
Marketing Tools:
JetpackWordPress.com Reader
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional service site for certified independent building and energy auditing expert in Latvia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 45 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
13 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(50 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:192.0.78.25, 192.0.78.24
Name Servers:
ns1.wordpress.com
ns2.wordpress.com
ns3.wordpress.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2005071858, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:67ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress hosted on WordPress.com, using the pub/mistylook theme and Jetpack plugin suite. The technology stack is modern but standard for small business sites. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of scripts and CSS minification. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD. The site uses WordPress.com analytics and tracking pixels, indicating minimal user tracking. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could be addressed to improve resilience. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Analyze Another Website