Is energynet.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Energynet
Check if energynet.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Energynet is a Latvia-based software development and IT solutions company established in 2001. It offers a broad range of services including custom software development, outsourcing, DevOps, QA, UX/UI design, and IT consulting. The company targets enterprises and startups globally, with a presence in over 150 countries and a portfolio of more than 1,000 completed projects. Their technical infrastructure is built on WordPress CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and Google services integration. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA v3, but lack explicit security headers and a published security policy. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and includes a cookie consent mechanism, though it lacks a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages. Overall, Energynet presents as a credible and established IT service provider with room for improvement in security and privacy transparency.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Energynet holds a strong market position as a mid-sized IT service provider with a diversified portfolio across multiple industries including technology, energy, healthcare, finance, retail, telecommunications, and manufacturing. Their business model focuses on B2B engagements, providing remote and dedicated development teams, and full-cycle software development. The company leverages certifications like ISO 9001:2008 to build trust and demonstrates global reach through extensive client base and product users. Their partnership ecosystem includes social media presence but no explicit partner domains were identified. Growth indicators include a long operational history and a large number of completed projects.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (1)
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security posture of Energynet is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from spam. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and others reduces the overall security robustness. No published security policy or incident response contacts were found, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The cookie consent banner indicates some level of privacy compliance, but the lack of a privacy policy page and vulnerability disclosure reduces compliance maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Energynet
Energynet is a trusted software development company offering innovative digital solutions and remote development teams for startups and business projects. They provide custom software development, outsourcing, offshore development, DevOps, QA, UX/UI design, IT consulting, and support services. Their solutions cover mobile, desktop, web, cloud, IoT, AR/VR, and high-load systems.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on contact form
- Cookie consent banner present
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 54 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
Critical Service Exposed: MySQL
CRITICALPort 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings