Is enric.dev Safe? Security Analysis for Enric
Check if enric.dev is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The website enric.dev is a personal professional portfolio for Enric, a software engineer with extensive experience in frontend and backend development at notable technology companies such as Vercel, Typeform, and Coolblue. The site serves as a digital resume and professional showcase targeting technology professionals, recruiters, and potential employers. It highlights Enric's career history, technical skills, and professional achievements. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast performance and good mobile optimization. The site uses Google Fonts and includes minimal tracking via Vercel Analytics. However, it lacks some security best practices such as security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data or collect user input via forms, which reduces risk. However, the absence of privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and security headers indicates room for improvement in compliance and security posture. No vulnerabilities or suspicious elements were detected. Overall, the website is professional, safe, and trustworthy as a personal portfolio but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Enric operates as an individual professional in the technology sector, focusing on software engineering with a specialization in frontend and backend development. The business model is personal branding and career promotion through an online portfolio. The website positions Enric as a skilled engineer with experience at reputable companies, targeting recruiters and technology employers. There is no indication of commercial transactions or product sales. The site links to major technology companies and educational institutions, reflecting a strong professional network. Growth indicators include recent employment at Vercel and a history of technical leadership roles. The partnership ecosystem is limited to professional affiliations rather than business partnerships.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security maturity level of the website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing attack surface. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options weakens defense against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, limiting transparency. Privacy compliance is minimal with no GDPR-related disclosures or cookie consent. The site does not provide vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a personal portfolio but should be enhanced to meet professional standards and regulatory expectations.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Enric
Personal professional portfolio website of Enric, showcasing his experience as a software engineer with a focus on frontend and backend development in technology companies.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data
- No forms collecting user data
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a personal portfolio for a software engineer named Enric.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 83 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings