Skip to main content

Is enso.build a Scam? Security Check Results - Enso Network Reviews

enso.build favicon

Is enso.build Safe? Security Analysis for Enso Network

Check if enso.build is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Framer (site generator)Google FontsWeb fonts (Inter, ABC Favorit)
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 3:51:25 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Enso Network is a technology platform focused on simplifying blockchain and onchain application development by providing a shared engine that abstracts manual blockchain and smart contract integrations. The website presents a modern, well-designed interface built with Framer, targeting developers and blockchain product teams. However, the site lacks critical compliance and security documentation such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and incident response information. Technically, the site uses HTTPS and modern web fonts but lacks security headers and analytics tracking. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better policy disclosures and security best practices. The domain registration data is consistent and supports the legitimacy of the business. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, publishing security and incident response plans, and improving security headers to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Framer (site generator)Google FontsWeb fonts (Inter, ABC Favorit)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Enso Network positions itself as an innovative platform in the blockchain technology sector, offering a unique solution to streamline onchain interactions and smart contract integrations. The business model appears to be platform-as-a-service aimed at developers and blockchain communities. The website content is focused and relevant, though lacking in detailed business information such as company size, founding year, or physical location. No partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed. The absence of contact information and compliance policies may hinder trust from potential customers or partners. The platform's use of modern web technologies and hosting indicates a digital-first approach, suitable for its target market.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No contact channels for security incidents are provided. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Enso Network

Description:

Enso is the fastest way to build and launch onchain. Every onchain interaction is mapped to a shared engine. No manual blockchain or smart contract integrations. No wasted time. Focus on product, community, and growth.

Key Services:
Onchain interaction engineBlockchain integration abstractionSmart contract interaction facilitation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Framer (site generator)Google FontsWeb fonts (Inter, ABC Favorit)
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is built with Framer, indicating modern design tools

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
medium(51 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:31.43.160.6, 31.43.161.6
Name Servers:
ns1.vercel-dns.com
ns2.vercel-dns.com
SOA:Serial: 1736246154, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:56ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer, a modern web design and hosting platform, leveraging web fonts such as Inter and ABC Favorit. Hosting is via framerusercontent.com, indicating managed hosting with likely good uptime and performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter cards. However, no analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but maintains basic usability. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. Technical debt appears low given the use of a modern CMS and hosting platform, but security enhancements are needed.
Analyze Another Website