Skip to main content

Is entrepreneur.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Entrepreneur Media, LLC Reviews

entrepreneur.com favicon

Is entrepreneur.com Safe? Security Analysis for Entrepreneur Media, LLC

Check if entrepreneur.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/alarge
Google Tag ManagerOsano Consent Management PlatformHubSpot (forms, analytics, ads pixel, messages)Tinypass (paywall)True Anthem (script)+2 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 6:48:27 AM
73
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Entrepreneur.com is a well-established media platform focused on providing advice, insights, profiles, and guides for entrepreneurs and business professionals worldwide. It serves as the home of Entrepreneur magazine and targets aspiring and established entrepreneurs with high-quality business content. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with excellent content quality and user experience. Technically, the site employs modern marketing and analytics technologies such as Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, and Osano for consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and publicly available security policies, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness slightly, but the overall business credibility remains high based on content and branding. Strategic recommendations include publishing clear privacy and terms policies, enhancing security headers, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerOsano Consent Management PlatformHubSpot (forms, analytics, ads pixel, messages)Tinypass (paywall)True Anthem (script)JavaScriptCSS Tailwind (implied by class names)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Entrepreneur.com holds a strong market position as a leading media outlet in the entrepreneurship sector. Its business model revolves around content publishing, advertising, and possibly subscription/paywall services (indicated by Tinypass integration). The platform leverages partnerships with marketing and analytics providers to optimize user engagement and advertising effectiveness. The target audience includes entrepreneurs, startups, and business owners seeking guidance and inspiration. The company appears to operate at a large scale with professional content and branding consistency. Growth indicators include extensive use of third-party marketing tools and a broad content offering. No direct parent or subsidiary companies were identified in the provided data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website maintains a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and a consent management platform in place, supporting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with room to enhance compliance and trust through better documentation and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive and easily accessible privacy policy and terms of service on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Entrepreneur Media, LLC

Description:

Advice, insight, profiles and guides for established and aspiring entrepreneurs worldwide. Home of Entrepreneur magazine.

Key Services:
Business advice articlesProfiles and interviewsGuides and how-to contentMagazine publishing
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerOsano Consent Management PlatformHubSpot (forms, analytics, ads pixel, messages)Tinypass (paywall)True Anthem (script)JavaScriptCSS Tailwind (implied by class names)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerHubSpot Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
TinypassTrue AnthemHubSpot Ads Pixel
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelHubSpot Analytics
Marketing Tools:
HubSpotOsano CMP
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:21266006.spf02.hubspotemail.net include:spf.mtasv.net include:mail.zendesk.com include:_spf.foxycart.com include:amazonses.com ~all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:re+87f0150b7a5f@inbound.dmarcdigests.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.2.217, 151.101.194.217, 151.101.130.217, 151.101.66.217
Name Servers:
ns1.inetops.comDNS only
ns2.inetops.comDNS only
ns3.inetops.comDNS only
ns4.inetops.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 60s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:39ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:21266006.spf02.hubspotemail.net include:spf.mtasv.net include:mail.zendesk.com include:_spf.foxycart.com include:amazonses.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern technology stack with integrations for analytics (Google Tag Manager, HubSpot), consent management (Osano), and paywall services (Tinypass). The front-end employs Tailwind CSS classes indicating a utility-first CSS framework. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preconnect hints to optimize resource loading. Mobile optimization and accessibility are rated excellent based on responsive design and semantic HTML usage. However, the lack of explicit CMS identification and hosting provider details limits full infrastructure assessment. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy documentation are recommended to reduce risk.
Analyze Another Website