Skip to main content

Is eoltas.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - UAB “Eoltas” Reviews

U

Is eoltas.lv Safe? Security Analysis for UAB “Eoltas”

Check if eoltas.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviamedium
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelOmnisendCustom JavaScript+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 12:48:07 AM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

EOLTAS is a well-established automotive parts retailer and distributor operating primarily in Latvia and the Baltic region since 1993. The company offers a wide range of engine and chassis parts for light and commercial vehicles sourced from Europe, Japan, and the USA. Their market position is strong, supported by authorized representation of over 80 manufacturers and adherence to ISO 9001 and TS16949 quality standards. The website serves both retail and B2B customers, providing an e-commerce platform with extensive product listings and customer information.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelOmnisendCustom JavaScriptCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets responsible vehicle owners and commercial operators, leveraging a business model focused on online sales and B2B services. Their competitive advantage lies in a broad product portfolio, quality certifications, and regional presence. The website integrates multiple marketing and tracking tools, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Partnerships and authorized dealership status with numerous manufacturers enhance their market credibility. Growth indicators include a large inventory and multi-country service coverage.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@ardeoltas.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712703****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and includes privacy and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting compliance with GDPR. However, it lacks explicit security headers and incident response policies, which are recommended for enhanced security posture. The use of third-party tracking scripts is balanced with user consent, but continuous monitoring for vulnerabilities in these scripts is advised. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the site against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

UAB “Eoltas”

Description:

EOLTAS is a growing auto parts trading company operating since 1993, serving responsible drivers in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, and Europe. They offer engine and chassis parts for light and commercial vehicles from Europe, Japan, and the USA, representing over 80 manufacturers and holding ISO 9001 and TS16949 quality certifications.

Key Services:
Online sales of automotive spare partsB2B client servicesDelivery and order fulfillment
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelOmnisendCustom JavaScriptCSS
Frameworks:
Google Tag Manager
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Privacy policy present
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with async loading

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFacebook PixelOmnisend
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelOmnisend
Marketing Tools:
Omnisend
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15724800; includeSubDomains"

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ip4:92.62.135.11/32 ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:185.65.48.54
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-e1.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-e2.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-e3.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-e4.googledomains.comDNS only
MX Records:
30: aspmx3.googlemail.com
30: aspmx2.googlemail.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx5.googlemail.com
20: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx4.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:117ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ip4:92.62.135.11/32 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Omnisend for marketing and analytics. The presence of Vue.js-like attributes suggests a SPA or component-based frontend framework. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site lacks explicit CMS identification but appears custom-built or heavily customized. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional e-commerce experience with room for security and accessibility improvements.
Analyze Another Website