Skip to main content

Is epapr.in a Scam? Security Check Results - epapr.in Reviews

epapr.in favicon

Is epapr.in Safe? Security Analysis for Newspapers,Magazines,books,comics-Read on web,android & iOS-Readwhere

Check if epapr.in is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/amedium
jQueryBootstrap 3.3.7Google FontsGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:20:42 PM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Readwhere.com is a digital media platform providing online access to magazines, newspapers, and books. The website targets a general audience interested in digital reading content and operates within the media industry. The platform uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Fonts, and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for analytics and social media functionalities. The website design is professional with good user experience and mobile optimization. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. The site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Security posture is weak due to missing security headers and no visible incident response or security policies. Advertising and tracking are moderate, primarily using Google services. Overall, the website is functional and content-rich but requires improvements in security, compliance, and transparency to enhance trust and credibility.

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrap 3.3.7Google FontsGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook SDK

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the digital content distribution sector, focusing on media consumption through magazines, newspapers, and books. The business model likely involves subscription or ad-supported content delivery. The platform targets a broad audience interested in reading digital publications. There is no clear information about company size, founding year, or parent company. The lack of WHOIS data and absence of contact information limit the ability to assess business credibility fully. The platform uses standard web technologies and integrates with major advertising and analytics providers, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is low to moderate. The website uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, or incident response information. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policies are present. The use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts introduces potential privacy concerns. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the content. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration information is a significant risk factor. Overall, the site requires enhanced security controls, transparency, and compliance measures to improve its security posture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Readwhere is a digital platform offering access to magazines, newspapers, and books online.

Key Services:
digital magazine readingnewspaper readingbook reading
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrap 3.3.7Google FontsGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook SDK
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerScorecardResearch
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Tracking Pixels:
ScorecardResearch
Marketing Tools:
Facebook SDK
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:transmail.net ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-alert@readwhere.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc-alert@readwhere.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
14 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(154 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:34.117.35.89
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-c1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-c2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-c3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-c4.googledomains.com
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:34ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:transmail.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional tech stack with jQuery and Bootstrap 3.3.7, which is somewhat dated but still functional. Google Fonts and Material Icons are used for typography and icons. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook SDK. The site loads multiple external scripts and stylesheets from reputable CDNs. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but could benefit from modernization. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or rich snippets detected. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the data.
Analyze Another Website