Skip to main content

Is erase.video a Scam? Security Check Results - erase.video Reviews

erase.video favicon

Is erase.video Safe? Security Analysis for Online Tool to Remove Logos, Texts, and Watermarks from Videos

Check if erase.video is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptBootstrap 4.6.2Nuxt.js (implied by _nuxt script paths)
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 12:39:14 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Erase.video is an online technology service launched in 2022 that provides users with a tool to remove logos, texts, and watermarks from TikTok and YouTube videos. The website targets content creators and social media users seeking easy-to-use video editing utilities. The business operates as a small-scale SaaS platform hosted on Alibaba Cloud, leveraging modern web technologies such as Nuxt.js and Bootstrap for frontend development. The site demonstrates good design quality and mobile optimization but lacks comprehensive privacy and security documentation. Security posture is moderate with no detected WAF or blocking mechanisms, but the absence of security headers and policies indicates room for improvement. Overall, the website is functional and safe for general audiences but would benefit from enhanced compliance and trust-building measures.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptBootstrap 4.6.2Nuxt.js (implied by _nuxt script paths)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business occupies a niche market in online video editing tools, focusing on watermark and logo removal. Its competitive advantage lies in simplicity and free accessibility, appealing to social media content creators. The business model likely includes freemium or paid upgrades, though no explicit monetization details are present. The company is newly founded in 2022, with no parent or subsidiary affiliations detected. The lack of contact information and formal policies may hinder trust and growth potential. Strategic partnerships or certifications are not evident, suggesting a lean operational structure.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, limiting transparency and readiness. No signs of malware or phishing were found. The site should prioritize implementing security best practices and compliance documentation to enhance user trust and reduce risk.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Online tool to easily remove logos, texts, and watermarks from TikTok or YouTube videos.

Key Services:
Logo removalText removalWatermark removal from videos
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptBootstrap 4.6.2Nuxt.js (implied by _nuxt script paths)
Frameworks:
BootstrapNuxt.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is an online tool for removing logos and watermarks from videos.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 34 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(456 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:34.105.95.163
Name Servers:
dns29.hichina.com
dns30.hichina.com
SOA:Serial: 2025042413, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:373ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Nuxt.js and Bootstrap 4.6.2, indicating a focus on responsive design and user experience. Hosting is provided by Alibaba Cloud, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate based on script preloading and CSS usage. SEO is basic with meta description and keywords present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The site lacks CMS indications, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical debt appears low but security and compliance gaps represent modernization opportunities.
Analyze Another Website