Skip to main content

Is erbe.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA ERBE Reviews

erbe.lv favicon

Is erbe.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA ERBE

Check if erbe.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
JavaScriptGoogle FontsGoogle Maps APIGoogle reCaptchaCSS3+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:30:52 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA ERBE is a Latvian landscaping company specializing in garden design, installation, reconstruction, and automatic irrigation systems. The company emphasizes creating easy-to-maintain, sustainable gardens tailored to the Latvian climate. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with clear service offerings and an integrated e-commerce platform for garden plants. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Google Maps API, and Google reCaptcha, ensuring a secure and user-friendly experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and CSRF protections, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-branded, and compliant with privacy regulations, making it a reliable source for potential customers.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle FontsGoogle Maps APIGoogle reCaptchaCSS3HTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

ERBE positions itself as a local expert in landscaping with over 10 years of experience, targeting private homeowners and commercial clients in Latvia. Their business model combines service delivery with product sales via an online store. The company maintains transparency with clear contact details, company registration, VAT, and bank information. Their partnership with AS Citadele bank and presence on major social media platforms supports their market credibility. The company’s focus on sustainable and easy-care gardens aligns with current market trends, providing a competitive advantage in the Latvian landscaping sector.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

e*****@erbe.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712000****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

SIA ERBE

VAT Number:

LV40203390020

Registration Number:

40203390020

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS, CSRF token implementation, and Google reCaptcha integration to prevent automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder rapid response to security issues. No visible vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposure were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be enhanced with additional policies and headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen browser security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA ERBE

Description:

ERBE is a professional landscaping company specializing in garden design, installation, reconstruction, and automatic irrigation systems. They focus on creating easy-to-maintain, sustainable gardens tailored to Latvian climate and customer needs.

Key Services:
Garden design and landscape architectureGarden installation and landscapingGarden reconstruction and renewalAutomatic irrigation system design and installation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle FontsGoogle Maps APIGoogle reCaptchaCSS3HTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in meta tag
  • Google reCaptcha integration

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCaptcha
Marketing Tools:
Google Maps API
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.228.7.30 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 46 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:91.228.7.30
Name Servers:
prodns1.esiautentisks.lvDNS only
prodns2.esiautentisks.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: erbe.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025070400, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:85ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.228.7.30 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern frontend stack with JavaScript, CSS3, and HTML5, leveraging Google Fonts and Google Maps API for enhanced user experience. The presence of a CSRF token and Google reCaptcha indicates attention to security in form handling. The site appears mobile-optimized and responsive, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but maintains basic usability standards.
Analyze Another Website