Is escrowdomains.com Safe? Security Analysis for Greenberg & Lieberman, LLC
Check if escrowdomains.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Greenberg & Lieberman, LLC operates escrowdomains.com, a specialized domain name escrow service backed by legal expertise. The company leverages nearly two decades of experience in intellectual property law to provide secure, attorney-backed escrow services for domain name transactions. Their market position is that of a trusted niche provider offering both automated and custom escrow solutions, targeting domain buyers, sellers, and lessors seeking legal assurance and transaction security. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good mobile optimization, employing modern web technologies such as React, Bootstrap, and Google Analytics. Hosting is inferred to be on Amazon AWS, ensuring reliable infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place, though improvements are recommended in DNSSEC deployment and HTTP security headers. Privacy compliance is basic, with privacy and terms policies present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with minor gaps in security and privacy practices.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The business operates in the technology sector, specifically focusing on domain name escrow and intellectual property legal services. Their business model centers on providing secure escrow transactions backed by legal advice, differentiating themselves with attorney oversight and custom transaction handling. Revenue streams likely include escrow fees and legal consultation. The target customers are domain investors, buyers, and sellers requiring secure and legally sound transactions. The company maintains partnerships with legal service providers (aplegal.com) and domain affiliate networks (domaining.com). The firm is small-sized, US-based, and well-established since 2002, with a consistent brand and professional online presence. Trust indicators include BBB accreditation and visible attorney profiles.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and the domain status clientTransferProhibited protects against unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice for domain security. No explicit HTTP security headers were detected in the HTML content, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible incident response or security policy page, and no dedicated security contact channels were found. The use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts introduces moderate tracking but no evident vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with additional controls and transparency.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Greenberg & Lieberman, LLC
Greenberg & Lieberman, LLC is an intellectual property law firm specializing in domain name escrow services, providing legal advice and secure escrow for domain name transactions. They offer services including purchase, rent, lease-to-buy domain names, backed by attorneys.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- ClientTransferProhibited domain status
- No DNSSEC enabled
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website provides a specialized domain name escrow service backed by a legal firm.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No SPF record found
HIGHSPF helps prevent email spoofing
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 66 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings