Skip to main content

Is esfondi.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Valsts kanceleja Reviews

esfondi.lv favicon

Is esfondi.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Valsts kanceleja

Check if esfondi.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentLatviamedium
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerAlpine.jsSVG icons
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 9:28:41 PM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.esfondi.lv serves as the primary official platform for information regarding European Union funds and the Recovery Fund in Latvia. It provides comprehensive resources including project selections, news, events, and professional guidance related to EU funding. The platform is positioned as a government service, targeting Latvian citizens, professionals involved in fund management, and the general public interested in EU fund opportunities. The content is primarily in Latvian with an English version available, reflecting its national focus with some international accessibility. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Alpine.js for interactivity and integrates Google Analytics with IP anonymization to monitor usage while respecting user privacy. The site includes a detailed cookie consent mechanism and a comprehensive privacy policy aligned with GDPR requirements. However, there is no visible evidence of advanced security headers in the HTML source, which could be improved to enhance security posture. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good privacy compliance and user consent management. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully assess domain registration legitimacy, but the presence of official government email contacts and consistent branding supports its authenticity. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating full accessibility. Overall, the site maintains a moderate to good security posture but could benefit from enhanced security header implementation and regular security audits. The overall risk assessment is low, with the platform serving as a trusted government information source. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive security headers, continuous monitoring of third-party scripts, and ensuring HTTPS enforcement across all pages to maintain and improve security and trustworthiness.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerAlpine.jsSVG icons

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website operates as an essential government platform under the Latvian State Chancellery, providing centralized information on EU funds and related financial instruments. Its market position is strong within the public sector, serving as the authoritative source for EU fund-related information in Latvia. The business model is informational and service-oriented, focusing on transparency, public engagement, and professional support for fund management. Revenue streams are not applicable as it is a government service. The target customer segments include Latvian citizens, government employees, project applicants, and professionals managing EU funds. Growth indicators include the addition of new content sections and multilingual support. The partnership ecosystem involves government agencies such as the State Chancellery, regional development agencies, and technical service providers. Strategic observations highlight the platform's role in enhancing public awareness and facilitating fund utilization in Latvia.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

v*****@mk.gov.lv
a*****@mk.gov.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with strong privacy compliance and user consent mechanisms. The use of Google Analytics with IP anonymization and a detailed cookie policy reflects adherence to GDPR standards. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site does not display an incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security culture appears focused on privacy and compliance but would benefit from enhanced technical security controls and documented incident response procedures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Valsts kanceleja

Description:

Galvenā ES fondu un Atveseļošanas fonda tīmekļvietne Latvijā. Projektu atlases, ziņas un pasākumi - uzzini vairāk par ES fondu aktualitātēm un notikumiem šeit.

Key Services:
Information on EU fundsProject selection announcementsNews and eventsProfessional resources for fund management
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerAlpine.jsSVG icons
Frameworks:
Alpine.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • Cookie consent with opt-in for analytics and social media cookies
  • Anonymize IP in Google Analytics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is an official Latvian government platform for EU funds information.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphoneform

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:194.213.9.132 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:d+4fhtsjxq@dmarc.lv
Forensic Reports:f+4fhtsjxq@dmarc.lv

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:195.244.145.221
Name Servers:
a.gov.lvDNS only
b.gov.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: esfondi-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025052800, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:48ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:194.213.9.132 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern front-end framework Alpine.js for reactive UI components and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site employs SVG icons for scalable graphics and includes responsive design elements for mobile optimization. Meta tags and Open Graph tags are properly configured for SEO and social media sharing. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented with persistent state management. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Accessibility features such as font size and contrast adjustments are provided, indicating attention to inclusive design. Technical risks include the absence of visible security headers and unknown SSL configuration status, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve trust.
Analyze Another Website