Is ether.fi Safe? Security Analysis for ether.fi
Check if ether.fi is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
ether.fi is a professional crypto staking and DeFi platform offering secure, scalable ETH staking services primarily targeting institutional clients and crypto users seeking yield optimization. The platform integrates DeFi-native products including liquid staking vaults and a non-custodial crypto Visa credit card with cashback rewards, positioning itself as a leading restaking platform with strong compliance and transparency. Technically, ether.fi leverages modern web technologies such as React and Next.js, ensuring fast performance, excellent mobile optimization, and good SEO practices. The security posture is robust, supported by multiple third-party audits, a bug bounty program, and open source transparency, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts could be improved. Overall, the platform demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and digital maturity, making it a credible player in the crypto finance sector.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on institutional and retail crypto staking services. Its business model combines staking rewards with DeFi integrations and real-world spending via a crypto credit card. The platform benefits from strategic partnerships with major DeFi protocols like Aave, Pendle, and Gearbox, and insurance coverage via Nexus Mutual. Investor backing and testimonials from notable crypto figures enhance its market position. The company emphasizes compliance, security, and user experience, targeting crypto investors who want to maximize earnings while maintaining control and liquidity. Growth indicators include active community engagement, open source development, and continuous product innovation.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
ether.fi exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and multiple security audits by reputable firms. The presence of a bug bounty program on Immunefi further strengthens its vulnerability management. The platform adopts a non-custodial approach, reducing risk exposure. However, the absence of a published security policy and direct incident response contact limits transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance with GDPR is evident through detailed privacy and cookie policies. Overall, ether.fi demonstrates strong security practices aligned with industry standards but could enhance incident response visibility.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
ether.fi
ether.fi offers institutions secure, scalable ETH staking with full transparency, custom custody integrations, and white-glove service via the ether.fi Fund. Built for compliance and yield optimization.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
excellent
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Security audits publicly available
- Bug bounty program
- Non-custodial wallet approach
- Open source transparency
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Professional crypto staking and DeFi platform targeting institutional and retail users.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
DMARC Partial Enforcement
LOWDMARC only applies to 50% of messages
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 35 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Weak SPF Policy
HIGHSPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings