Skip to main content

Is ethereum.foundation a Scam? Security Check Results - Stiftung Ethereum Reviews

S

Is ethereum.foundation Safe? Security Analysis for Stiftung Ethereum

Check if ethereum.foundation is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologySwitzerlandmedium
Next.jsReactAWS DNSOVH DNS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:43:11 AM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Ethereum Foundation, registered as Stiftung Ethereum in Switzerland since 2014, operates the domain ethereum.foundation. The website appears to be built using modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, hosted on infrastructure involving AWS and OVH DNS services. However, the site content is minimal with no visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and lacks contact information or forms. This limits the user experience and compliance posture. Security-wise, the domain is registered transparently without privacy protection, but DNSSEC is not enabled and no security headers are detected, indicating room for improvement in security hardening. Overall, the site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms but requires significant enhancements in content, privacy compliance, and security practices to meet professional and regulatory standards.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReactAWS DNSOVH DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Ethereum Foundation is a key entity in the blockchain and cryptocurrency sector, focusing on the development and support of Ethereum technology. The domain age and registrant information align with an established foundation. The business model likely revolves around technology development, community support, and ecosystem growth. The lack of detailed content and contact information on the website suggests a possible reliance on other channels for stakeholder engagement. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiaries linked via the website. The foundation's market position is strong in the blockchain space, but the website does not currently reflect this with comprehensive digital presence or marketing tools.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is basic. The site uses HTTPS (implied by domain and modern hosting) but lacks DNSSEC and security headers such as CSP or HSTS. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks but also limiting insights. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The domain registration is transparent and consistent with the foundation's identity, which supports trustworthiness. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Stiftung Ethereum

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReactAWS DNSOVH DNS
Frameworks:
Next.jsReact
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and lacks key pages such as privacy policy, cookie policy, and terms of service.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:re+a5c4f9e560fa@inbound.dmarcdigests.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(261 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:15.197.167.90, 3.33.186.135
Name Servers:
dns19.ovh.netWHOIS only
ns-12.awsdns-01.com
ns-1325.awsdns-37.orgDNS only
ns-1953.awsdns-52.co.ukDNS only
ns-661.awsdns-18.net
pikachu.ethquokkaops.ioWHOIS only
MX Records:
5: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:79ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, indicating a contemporary technical infrastructure. Hosting involves AWS and OVH DNS services, which are reputable providers. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of JavaScript chunks. However, the site lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. The absence of analytics or marketing tools limits business intelligence capabilities. Technical debt appears low but the minimal content and missing policies indicate incomplete implementation. Opportunities exist to improve mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO to better serve users and search engines.
Analyze Another Website