Skip to main content

Is etracker.com a Scam? Security Check Results - etracker Reviews

etracker.com favicon

Is etracker.com Safe? Security Analysis for etracker

Check if etracker.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyGermanymedium
JavaScriptWordPressYoast SEOWPMLetracker analytics scripts+2 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:12:45 AM
76
Security Score
LOW RISK

AI Summary

etracker is a German-based technology company providing a privacy-focused web analytics platform positioned as a European alternative to Google Analytics. Their services include web analytics, tag management, consent management, and data warehouse synchronization, targeting marketers and businesses seeking GDPR-compliant analytics solutions. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in content, emphasizing data privacy and compliance with European data protection laws. Technically, the site uses WordPress CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and includes fraud detection and consent management scripts, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and business indicators suggest legitimacy. Overall, etracker presents a trustworthy and professional analytics service with a strong privacy compliance focus.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptWordPressYoast SEOWPMLetracker analytics scriptsFraud0 fraud detectionSignalize

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

etracker holds a solid market position as a privacy-compliant analytics provider in Europe, differentiating itself from Google Analytics by offering cookieless tracking and consent-free data collection under GDPR and TDDDG guidelines. Their business model is SaaS-based, serving medium-sized enterprises and marketers who prioritize data protection. The company supports its customers with consulting and training services, enhancing customer retention and value. The presence of customer testimonials and certifications strengthens their credibility. The ecosystem includes partners and clients from various sectors, indicating a broad market reach. However, the lack of visible WHOIS registrant data is a potential risk factor for trust and should be addressed.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@etracker.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a high security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and integrated consent management aligned with GDPR. The inclusion of fraud detection scripts indicates proactive risk management. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. To improve, etracker should publish explicit security and incident response information and consider a vulnerability disclosure channel to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and compliance frameworks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

etracker

Description:

etracker analytics ist die europäische Alternative zu Google Analytics für erfolgreiches & rechtskonformes Onlinemarketing ohne Datenverlust.

Key Services:
Web analyticsTag ManagerConsent ManagerBI & Data Warehouse SyncConsultingAcademy training
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptWordPressYoast SEOWPMLetracker analytics scriptsFraud0 fraud detectionSignalize
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management implemented
  • Fraud detection scripts included
  • Cookie blocking and consent banners

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
etracker analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:excellent

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Fraud0Signalizeetracker analytics
Marketing Tools:
etracker Tag Manageretracker Consent Manager
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

75/100
Score

Weak X-Frame-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "ALLOW-FROM https://newapp.etracker.com"

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

100/100
Score
No issues found

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

73/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:62.201.164.96/27 ip4:91.192.40.0/22 ip4:91.222.98.0/24 ip4:62.201.164.123 ip6:2001:868:100:5601::14 ip6:2001:868:100:5601::123 ip4:62.201.164.100 include:_spf.senders.scnem.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-reports@etracker.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc-reports@etracker.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(77 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:62.201.164.114
Name Servers:
greg.ns.cloudflare.com
reza.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
100: mail2.etracker.com
10: mail.etracker.com
SOA:Serial: 2381274021, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:57ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:62.201.164.96/27 ip4:91.192.40.0/22 ip4:91.222.98.0/24 ip4:62.201.164.123 ip6:2001:868:100:5601::14 ip6:2001:868:100:5601::123 ip4:62.201.164.100 include:_spf.senders.scnem.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with modern front-end technologies including JavaScript and CSS optimizations. It uses Yoast SEO and WPML for SEO and multilingual support, indicating good digital maturity. Performance is optimized with preloading of critical assets and responsive images. The site includes advanced tracking and consent management scripts from etracker and third-party fraud detection services. Accessibility and SEO are well addressed. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but HTTPS and security headers indicate a secure hosting environment. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a fast, secure, and user-friendly experience with room for improvement in security transparency.
Analyze Another Website