Skip to main content

Is eurex.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Eurex Reviews

eurex.lv favicon

Is eurex.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Eurex

Check if eurex.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceLatviasmall
WordPressjQueryGoogle Analytics
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:47:00 PM
40
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Eurex is a small regional financial services company specializing in currency exchange and money transfer services primarily in Latvia and Estonia. The website presents a clear business focus on retail currency exchange, banknote and coin exchange, and fast money transfers via MoneyGram. The company maintains physical branch offices with contact details and operating hours clearly listed, supporting its legitimacy and customer accessibility. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. While the site is functional and professionally designed, it lacks advanced mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and modern security practices. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy for its business purpose but would benefit from improved security and privacy measures.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryGoogle Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Eurex operates in the finance sector, targeting travelers and individuals needing currency exchange and money transfer services. Its business model is retail-focused with physical branches in Latvia and Estonia. The partnership with MoneyGram enhances its service offerings. The company appears to have a stable regional presence but lacks visible certifications or advanced digital maturity. Revenue streams likely come from currency exchange margins and transfer fees. The website content and structure indicate a focus on clarity and customer service, though digital marketing and privacy compliance could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data limits full verification of business registration details.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@eurex.lv

Phone Numbers (2)

+3716763****
+3712000****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, which is mandatory for financial services. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are important to mitigate common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. Forms do not show advanced protections like CAPTCHA or input validation visible in the HTML. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating potential gaps in security governance. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no GDPR-related disclosures or cookie consent mechanisms detected. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate and requires improvements to meet industry best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Eurex

Description:

Eurex is a currency exchange and money transfer service provider operating in Latvia and Estonia. They offer currency exchange in cash, exchange of notes and coins, fast money transfers via MoneyGram, foreign coin buying and selling, and currency ordering services.

Key Services:
Currency exchange in cashExchange of banknotes and coinsMoneyGram fast money transfersForeign coin buying and sellingCurrency ordering
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryGoogle Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 79 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

10 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:217.146.69.14
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: zonemx.eu
SOA:Serial: 1578057010, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:241ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using standard themes and plugins. It uses jQuery 1.8.2 and jQuery UI 1.9.1, which are outdated and may pose security risks. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site loads external resources from Google APIs and jQuery CDN. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization techniques detected. Mobile optimization is basic, with a fixed viewport width of 1000px, which may not provide a fully responsive experience on smaller devices. Accessibility features are minimal. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags found. The site would benefit from modernization of its tech stack and improved front-end responsiveness.
Analyze Another Website