Skip to main content

Is euroautopartners.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA EURO AUTO PARTNERS Reviews

euroautopartners.lv favicon

Is euroautopartners.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA EURO AUTO PARTNERS

Check if euroautopartners.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
Nuxt.jsVue.jsSwiper.jsGoogle FontsjQuery
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:39:47 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA EURO AUTO PARTNERS operates a vehicle sales and leasing business based in Jelgava, Latvia. The company offers a catalog of used cars primarily sourced from Europe, along with leasing options and car consignment services. The website is professionally designed using modern web technologies such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, providing a good user experience with clear navigation and mobile optimization. Contact information including phone numbers, email, and physical addresses are clearly presented, supporting business credibility. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with data protection regulations such as GDPR. Security headers are not detected, which suggests room for improvement in security posture. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security measures.

Detected Technologies

Nuxt.jsVue.jsSwiper.jsGoogle FontsjQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets individuals and businesses in Latvia seeking used vehicles and leasing solutions. Its business model combines direct vehicle sales with financial services (leasing) and vehicle consignment. The market position appears regional with a focus on Jelgava and surrounding areas. The website content and contact details reinforce legitimacy and trustworthiness. The use of modern frontend frameworks indicates a commitment to digital maturity. Marketing tools from third parties are minimal, suggesting a focus on organic reach or direct customer engagement. The lack of detailed WHOIS data and privacy policies are notable gaps that could impact customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

a*****@gmail.com

Phone Numbers (2)

+3712845****
+3712979****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

SIA EURO AUTO PARTNERS

Registration Number:

43603083870

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, no explicit security headers (such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS) are evident, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency in incident response. Forms are present for email capture but no advanced security measures (like CAPTCHA) are visible. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, privacy policies, and incident response mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA EURO AUTO PARTNERS

Description:

Auto tirdzniecība, auto no Eiropas, līzings, maiņa. The company offers vehicle sales, leasing services, and car consignment.

Key Services:
Auto līzingsAuto tirdzniecībaPārdod savu auto
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Nuxt.jsVue.jsSwiper.jsGoogle FontsjQuery
Frameworks:
Nuxt.jsVue.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL scheme https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
elizings.org scripts
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 35 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:138.201.249.125
Name Servers:
felipe.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
rachel.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2379038586, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:93ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework stack (Nuxt.js and Vue.js) with integration of Swiper.js for UI components and Google Fonts for typography. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets asynchronously, indicating an optimized loading strategy. The presence of jQuery and third-party scripts from elizings.org suggests some legacy or marketing-related dependencies. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. No CMS is explicitly detected, implying a custom or framework-based solution. The hosting provider is not identified from the HTML content. SEO optimization is basic with proper meta charset and viewport tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. Accessibility is basic with room for improvement in form labeling and ARIA attributes.
Analyze Another Website