Skip to main content

Is eventhub.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Eventhub Reviews

eventhub.lv favicon

Is eventhub.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Eventhub

Check if eventhub.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityLatviasmall
jQueryGoogle AnalyticsFontAwesomeAOS (Animate On Scroll)Yoast SEO+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:33:11 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Eventhub is a small Latvian DMC agency specializing in the production and management of full scope MICE (Meetings, Incentives, Conferences, and Exhibitions) events. The company targets corporate clients and event organizers seeking professional event management services. The website is built on WordPress and uses common industry-standard plugins and libraries, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The technical infrastructure supports good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the website presents a professional image but could benefit from enhanced compliance and security measures to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

jQueryGoogle AnalyticsFontAwesomeAOS (Animate On Scroll)Yoast SEOContact Form 7Jetpack

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Eventhub operates in the hospitality sector focusing on event management services within Latvia. The business model revolves around providing comprehensive event production services to corporate clients. The website content and structure suggest a niche regional market position with a small company size. Contact details and branding are consistent, supporting business credibility. The absence of privacy and cookie policies may indicate a gap in compliance readiness. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content. The company appears to maintain a straightforward service offering without complex revenue streams or extensive digital marketing integrations.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

e*****@eventhub.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712833****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with no visible security misconfigurations or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The site uses common WordPress plugins, which require regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, potentially exposing the company to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with better policies and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Eventhub

Description:

DMC agency founded by event industry professionals focusing on production of the full scope MICE events.

Key Services:
Event productionMICE event management
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryGoogle AnalyticsFontAwesomeAOS (Animate On Scroll)Yoast SEOContact Form 7Jetpack
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsJetpack Stats
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
WordPress Stats (Jetpack)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.162 include:_spf.if28.nano.lv a mx ip4:91.203.68.160/27 +ip4:85.31.97.39 -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 67 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

7 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.68.162
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: eventhub.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025070800, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:129ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.162 include:_spf.if28.nano.lv a mx ip4:91.203.68.160/27 +ip4:85.31.97.39 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a combination of popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, FontAwesome, and AOS for animations. SEO is managed via the Yoast SEO plugin, and contact forms are handled by Contact Form 7. Google Analytics and Jetpack Stats are used for traffic analysis. The site loads resources from multiple external domains including Google Fonts and CDN services. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and mobile optimization is good. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy mechanisms. The technical stack is standard for small business websites but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website