Skip to main content

Is evmos.org a Scam? Security Check Results - evmos.org Reviews

E

Is evmos.org Safe? Security Analysis for Page not found · GitHub Pages

Check if evmos.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 7:01:46 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website at evmos.org currently serves only a 404 error page hosted on GitHub Pages, indicating that the actual website content is missing or not deployed. There is no visible business information, contact details, or policies, which severely limits the ability to assess the company's operations or market position. The domain is registered through NameCheap, Inc. since 2021 and is valid until 2026, but the lack of content suggests the site is either under development or abandoned. Technically, the site is hosted on GitHub Pages with minimal security headers such as Content-Security-Policy. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or DNSSEC enabled, and no analytics or tracking technologies are present. The site’s performance and SEO are poor due to the absence of content and metadata. From a security perspective, the site shows basic security header implementation but lacks critical protections like HTTPS and DNSSEC. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are found, and no contact or incident response information is available. The domain registration is consistent and not privacy-protected, which is typical for a standard domain but does not compensate for the lack of website content. Overall, the website is currently non-functional from a user and business perspective, with a low trust and professionalism rating. Strategic recommendations include deploying actual website content, enabling HTTPS and DNSSEC, adding privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact and business information to improve credibility and security posture.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of website content, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain age suggests a relatively recent registration in 2021, which aligns with a technology or blockchain project timeline. However, no information about market positioning, competitive advantages, revenue streams, or partnerships is available. The lack of contact details and policies indicates the site is not currently operational or publicly engaging with customers or partners.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal with only a Content-Security-Policy header detected. There is no information about HTTPS enforcement or SSL configuration, and DNSSEC is not enabled. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies are present. The site is vulnerable to common web security risks due to missing protections and lack of active content. The domain status clientTransferProhibited is a positive indicator but insufficient to mitigate the overall weak security posture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Deploy a functional website with relevant business content to replace the 404 error page.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Platforms:
GitHub Pages
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Content-Security-Policy header present

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible, showing a 404 error page from GitHub Pages.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(338 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:185.199.108.153, 185.199.110.153, 185.199.109.153, 185.199.111.153
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1755853498, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:107ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on GitHub Pages, which provides a reliable platform but currently only serves a 404 error page. The HTML includes a Content-Security-Policy header restricting resource loading, but no other modern technologies or frameworks are detected. There is no evidence of CMS usage or analytics tools. The site lacks SEO meta tags and structured data, limiting search engine visibility. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic due to minimal content. Performance is moderate given the simple page but irrelevant without actual content.
Analyze Another Website