Skip to main content

Is example.com a Scam? Security Check Results - example.com Reviews

E

Is example.com Safe? Security Analysis for Example Domain

Check if example.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 12:31:53 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website example.com serves as a reserved domain for illustrative examples in documentation and is managed by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). It does not represent a commercial business or provide services but rather functions as a standard placeholder domain widely recognized in technical and educational materials. The site content is minimal, consisting of a simple informational page with no interactive elements or business-related content. From a technical perspective, the website is straightforward with basic HTML and CSS, demonstrating good mobile responsiveness and fast loading times due to its minimal content. There is no evidence of advanced technologies, content management systems, or analytics tools. Security configurations such as HTTPS status and security headers are not explicitly provided, but the domain's management by IANA suggests a stable and secure infrastructure. Security posture is minimal but acceptable given the nature of the site. No privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, or contact information are present, reflecting the non-commercial and informational purpose of the domain. The WHOIS data confirms the domain's legitimacy, long registration history, and consistent use as a reserved domain, which supports a high trust level despite the lack of typical business security and compliance features. Overall, the site poses minimal risk and requires no immediate security or compliance improvements given its purpose. However, enabling DNSSEC and adding basic security headers could enhance domain security. The lack of privacy and cookie policies is consistent with the site's non-commercial nature but would be necessary if the site evolved to collect user data.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Example.com is positioned as a foundational internet resource reserved for documentation and illustrative purposes. It holds no commercial business model, revenue streams, or customer segments. Its primary value lies in its universal recognition as a standard example domain, which supports educational and technical documentation worldwide. There are no partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies beyond IANA's stewardship. The domain's longevity since 1995 indicates stability and trust in the internet community. The absence of business services or products means competitive advantages and market positioning are not applicable.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of example.com is minimal but appropriate for its role as a reserved example domain. There are no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The domain lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended best practices. No incident response contacts or security policies are published, reflecting the site's informational nature. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations is not applicable due to the absence of user data collection. The domain's registration by IANA and its long history provide strong legitimacy and trustworthiness, mitigating typical security concerns.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

This domain is for use in illustrative examples in documents. It is not a commercial business website.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

The website is a minimal placeholder page with no commercial or business content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k20
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

80/100
Score

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.example.com
Issuer:DigiCert Global G3 TLS ECC SHA384 2020 CA1
Valid Until:1/15/2026 (132 days)
SANs:*.example.com, example.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain:

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:23.220.75.232, 23.215.0.138, 23.215.0.136, 23.220.75.245, 23.192.228.80, 23.192.228.84
AAAA Records:2600:1406:bc00:53::b81e:94c8, 2600:1406:bc00:53::b81e:94ce, 2600:1408:ec00:36::1736:7f24, 2600:1408:ec00:36::1736:7f31, 2600:1406:5e00:6::17ce:bc12, 2600:1406:5e00:6::17ce:bc1b
Name Servers:
a.iana-servers.netDNS only
b.iana-servers.netDNS only
MX Records:
0:
SOA:Serial: 2025082221, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:32ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with simple, valid HTML and CSS, featuring responsive design for mobile devices. No JavaScript libraries, frameworks, or CMS platforms are detected. Hosting is managed by IANA, indicating a stable and authoritative infrastructure. Performance is fast due to minimal content and no external dependencies. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility is basic but sufficient given the limited content. There is no evidence of technical debt or modernization needs given the site's static nature.
Analyze Another Website