Skip to main content

Is exxe.one a Scam? Security Check Results - exxe.one Reviews

exxe.one favicon

Is exxe.one Safe? Security Analysis for exxe.one

Check if exxe.one is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Statessmall
WordPressMinimal Coming Soon & Maintenance Mode pluginWebFont LoaderGoogle Fonts (via bunny.net)
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:30:38 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website exxe.one is currently under maintenance mode, displaying only a placeholder message with no substantive business content or services described. The domain is relatively new, registered in 2022, and uses privacy protection via Dynadot Privacy Service. The site is built on WordPress using a common maintenance mode plugin, with minimal technical complexity and no visible security or privacy policies. There are no contact details or social media links provided, limiting business credibility and user trust. Technically, the site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and no HTTPS status was confirmed from the data provided. Overall, the website is in an early or transitional stage with limited digital maturity and security posture.

Detected Technologies

WordPressMinimal Coming Soon & Maintenance Mode pluginWebFont LoaderGoogle Fonts (via bunny.net)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of business content, no clear market positioning, business model, or target audience can be identified. The domain's privacy protection and recent creation suggest a new or small business entity, but no further business intelligence or partnership ecosystem is evident. The lack of contact information and policies limits transparency and trustworthiness, which are critical for customer engagement and regulatory compliance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal with no DNSSEC enabled and no security headers detected. The use of privacy protection for WHOIS is standard but reduces transparency. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site does not currently expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries, but the lack of HTTPS confirmation and security best practices is a concern. Overall, security maturity is low, and improvements are needed to meet basic security standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and verify proper configuration.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website is currently under maintenance with a placeholder message indicating temporary downtime. No business description or services are provided.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressMinimal Coming Soon & Maintenance Mode pluginWebFont LoaderGoogle Fonts (via bunny.net)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently in maintenance mode with minimal content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +a:cranky-zhukovsky.95-169-201-168.plesk.page -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1464-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 31 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(214 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:95.169.201.168
Name Servers:
ns1.exxe.one
ns2.exxe.one
MX Records:
10: mail.exxe.one
SOA:Serial: 2025072104, TTL: 10800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:78ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +a:cranky-zhukovsky.95-169-201-168.plesk.page -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS with a minimal coming soon and maintenance mode plugin. Fonts are loaded via bunny.net using WebFont Loader. The site is hosted with Dynadot Inc, which is also the registrar. Performance is moderate given the minimal content, but SEO and accessibility are poor due to lack of metadata and structured content. The site is not optimized for mobile beyond basic responsiveness. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking tools. Technical debt is low but modernization opportunities exist, especially in security and compliance.
Analyze Another Website