Skip to main content

Is f-droid.org a Scam? Security Check Results - F-Droid Contributors Reviews

f-droid.org favicon

Is f-droid.org Safe? Security Analysis for F-Droid Contributors

Check if f-droid.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyIcelandsmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScript
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 12:41:45 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

F-Droid is a well-established open source project founded in 2010 that provides a free and open source software repository for Android applications. It targets users who prefer FOSS apps and offers a client for easy browsing, installation, and update tracking. The project is community-driven and funded primarily through donations, with a clear focus on transparency and user empowerment. The website supports multiple languages and provides community engagement through forums and documentation.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

F-Droid occupies a niche market position as an alternative to mainstream Android app stores, emphasizing free and open source software. Its business model relies on community donations rather than commercial revenue streams. The project benefits from a loyal user base interested in privacy and software freedom. Partnerships with donation platforms like Open Collective and Liberapay support its funding. The absence of commercial advertising and tracking aligns with its open source ethos, enhancing trust among its audience.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

f*****@floss.social

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates basic security awareness, including HTTPS usage and PGP verification instructions for downloads, which is critical for software distribution. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. The domain uses privacy protection for WHOIS, which is justified for an open source community project. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with formal policies and enhanced technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a clear privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

F-Droid Contributors

Description:

F-Droid is an installable catalogue of FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) applications for the Android platform. The client makes it easy to browse, install, and keep track of updates on your device.

Key Services:
Catalog of free and open source Android appsApp client for browsing, installing, and updating appsCommunity forum and documentation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScript
Platforms:
Android (target platform for apps)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://f-droid.org/)
  • PGP verification instructions for downloads

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

95/100
Score

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mailcow.de ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:mailauth-reports@f-droid.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:37.218.243.72, 65.21.79.229
AAAA Records:2a01:4f9:3b:546d::2, 2a00:c6c0:0:155:1::1
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.comDNS only
dns2.registrar-servers.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: hosted.mailcow.de

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mailcow.de ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses standard modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with no heavy frameworks detected. It is optimized for mobile with good multilingual support and clear navigation. Hosting details are limited but domain registration is stable and long-standing. Performance is moderate with no obvious technical debt. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts aligns with privacy-focused principles but limits marketing insights. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and formalized policies.
Analyze Another Website