Skip to main content

Is f1000.com a Scam? Security Check Results - F1000 Research Ltd. Reviews

F

Is f1000.com Safe? Security Analysis for F1000 Research Ltd.

Check if f1000.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationUnited Kingdommedium
WordPressReactBootstrapGoogle Tag ManagerTwitter Universal Website Tag+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:49:19 AM
71
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

F1000 Research Ltd. operates a professional open research publishing platform aimed at researchers, funders, institutions, and societies. The company provides open research publishing services, consulting, and resources to accelerate knowledge dissemination. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in relevant content, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site uses WordPress with modern frameworks and integrates analytics and consent management tools, indicating a good level of digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and consent mechanisms, though some security headers and explicit policies are missing. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern and warrants further investigation to confirm domain legitimacy. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional front with minor areas for improvement in security transparency and domain registration clarity.

Detected Technologies

WordPressReactBootstrapGoogle Tag ManagerTwitter Universal Website TagTranscend Consent Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

F1000 is positioned as an essential player in the education and research publishing sector, leveraging partnerships with major funders like the European Commission and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Its business model focuses on open access publishing and consulting services, targeting a specialized audience of researchers and institutions. The company appears medium-sized, founded in 2013, with a strong content strategy including blogs, webinars, and case studies. The partnership ecosystem and active social media presence support its market credibility and growth potential. Revenue streams likely include publishing fees and consulting contracts. The website's professional presentation and comprehensive resources indicate a well-established operation.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and a consent management platform compliant with GDPR. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for transparency and trust. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected, representing an area for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The absence of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency but does not directly impact site security. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with clearer policies and technical headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

F1000 Research Ltd.

Description:

F1000 is an open research publisher and services provider that enables researchers, funders, research institutions, societies, and associations to accelerate the reach of knowledge.

Key Services:
open research publishingopen research consultingpublishing venuesresources for researchers
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressReactBootstrapGoogle Tag ManagerTwitter Universal Website TagTranscend Consent Manager
Frameworks:
Gutenberg (WordPress block editor)
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Diet3Dart
Tracking Pixels:
Twitter Universal Website Tag
Marketing Tools:
Transcend Consent Manager
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

90/100
Score

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

85/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_u.f1000.com._spf.smart.ondmarc.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:937ab994@inbox.ondmarc.com
Forensic Reports:937ab994@inbox.ondmarc.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 65 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
23 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(120 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:141.193.213.10, 141.193.213.11
Name Servers:
ns-1392.awsdns-46.org
ns-195.awsdns-24.com
ns-1974.awsdns-54.co.uk
ns-585.awsdns-09.net
MX Records:
10: us-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com
10: us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:103ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_u.f1000.com._spf.smart.ondmarc.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using the Gutenberg block editor and React libraries, combined with Bootstrap for responsive design. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Twitter tracking scripts for analytics and marketing. Consent management is handled by Transcend Consent Manager, indicating a focus on privacy compliance. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets efficiently and is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing third-party scripts and caching. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Analyze Another Website