Skip to main content

Is fabiao.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 四川博文网络科技有限责任公司 Reviews

fabiao.com favicon

Is fabiao.com Safe? Security Analysis for 四川博文网络科技有限责任公司

Check if fabiao.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationChinamedium
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryBaidu Analytics
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 11:11:17 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

发表之家 operates as a specialized platform providing academic journal consultation and subscription services primarily targeting researchers, educators, and academic institutions in China. Established since 2010, it claims extensive partnerships with over 300 provincial and ministerial-level journal publishers, positioning itself as a significant player in the Chinese academic publishing support market. The website offers a broad catalog of journals across multiple disciplines, including education, medicine, economics, and technology, supported by a user-friendly interface and live customer support.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryBaidu Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business model centers on facilitating journal subscriptions and providing consulting services related to academic publishing. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive journal database and partnerships, enabling it to serve a wide audience of academic professionals and institutions. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees and consulting services. The presence of official business licenses and ICP备案 indicates regulatory compliance within China. The platform's ecosystem includes partnerships with educational and research-related websites, enhancing its market reach and credibility.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

400*******

Company Registration

Legal Name:

四川博文网络科技有限责任公司

Registration Number:

91510922555779572Q

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and employs Baidu Analytics for user tracking. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms are present, which may pose compliance risks under privacy regulations. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the website's business licenses and contact information support its authenticity. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced header policies and privacy compliance improvements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against common attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

四川博文网络科技有限责任公司

Description:

发表之家(fabiao.com)起始于2010年,具有多年期刊服务经验,主要从事期刊咨询、订阅等服务,目前已经获得300余家省级、部级期刊杂志社合作伙伴,是从事期刊咨询的网站。

Key Services:
期刊咨询杂志订阅投稿经验分享知识管理
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryBaidu Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Baidu Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu Analytics
Marketing Tools:
Live chat scripts from jiain.net and soperson.com
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:61.147.81.215
Name Servers:
f1g1ns1.dnspod.netDNS only
f1g1ns2.dnspod.netDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1747643131, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:425ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with jQuery libraries and Baidu Analytics integration. It uses external live chat scripts from third-party providers for customer support. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detected. The site is mobile-optimized with a clear and consistent design, though accessibility features are basic. Technical risks include lack of security headers and incomplete privacy compliance.
Analyze Another Website